Daniela Brazete

618 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 481 citations indexed

About

Daniela Brazete is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Oral Surgery and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniela Brazete has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 481 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 4 papers in Oral Surgery and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Daniela Brazete's work include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (7 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers) and Dental materials and restorations (2 papers). Daniela Brazete is often cited by papers focused on Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (7 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers) and Dental materials and restorations (2 papers). Daniela Brazete collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, India and China. Daniela Brazete's co-authors include J.M.F. Ferreira, Anuraag Gaddam, Hugo R. Fernandes, George E. Stan, Avito Rebelo, B. Eraiah, Naga Krishnakanth Katturi, K. Jayanthi, P.M.C. Torres and G. Jagannath and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Journal of the American Ceramic Society and Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids.

In The Last Decade

Daniela Brazete

8 papers receiving 474 citations

Hit Papers

Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics for Healthcare Appli... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniela Brazete Portugal 8 377 141 106 102 97 8 481
Juliana Kelmy Macário Barboza Daguano Brazil 14 279 0.7× 126 0.9× 115 1.1× 179 1.8× 82 0.8× 39 503
Himanshu Tripathi India 13 326 0.9× 162 1.1× 131 1.2× 110 1.1× 118 1.2× 31 516
Deug Joong Kim South Korea 11 292 0.8× 122 0.9× 190 1.8× 84 0.8× 105 1.1× 21 509
Laura Fiocco Italy 11 276 0.7× 70 0.5× 143 1.3× 126 1.2× 53 0.5× 15 455
E. Palčevskis Latvia 12 452 1.2× 126 0.9× 237 2.2× 56 0.5× 100 1.0× 32 614
J. Ma China 12 329 0.9× 150 1.1× 151 1.4× 48 0.5× 109 1.1× 32 567
Л. И. Шворнева Russia 11 279 0.7× 60 0.4× 205 1.9× 95 0.9× 60 0.6× 74 477
Sara Banijamali Iran 15 246 0.7× 98 0.7× 287 2.7× 261 2.6× 77 0.8× 34 643
Monika Furkó Hungary 15 300 0.8× 69 0.5× 174 1.6× 47 0.5× 115 1.2× 34 463
Setsuro Ito Japan 8 330 0.9× 214 1.5× 94 0.9× 108 1.1× 203 2.1× 14 529

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Brazete

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Brazete's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Brazete with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Brazete more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Brazete

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Brazete. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Brazete. The network helps show where Daniela Brazete may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Brazete

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Brazete. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Brazete based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Brazete. Daniela Brazete is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Gaddam, Anuraag, et al.. (2021). Three‐dimensional printing of zirconia scaffolds for load bearing applications: Study of the optimal fabrication conditions. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 104(9). 4368–4380. 18 indexed citations
2.
Gaddam, Anuraag, et al.. (2021). Robocasting and surface functionalization with highly bioactive glass of ZrO 2 scaffolds for load bearing applications. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 105(3). 1753–1764. 15 indexed citations
3.
Kapoor, Saurabh, Daniela Brazete, Inês Pereira, et al.. (2019). Impact of transition metal ions on the structure and bioactivity of alkali-free bioactive glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 506. 98–108. 25 indexed citations
4.
Jagannath, G., B. Eraiah, Anuraag Gaddam, et al.. (2019). Structural and Femtosecond Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Sodium Borate Oxide Glasses: Effect of Antimony. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 123(9). 5591–5602. 82 indexed citations
5.
Brazete, Daniela, et al.. (2019). Cuttlefish Bone-Derived Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds Coated with Sol-Gel Derived Bioactive Glass. Materials. 12(17). 2711–2711. 10 indexed citations
6.
Brazete, Daniela, P.M.C. Torres, J.C.C. Abrantes, & J.M.F. Ferreira. (2018). Influence of the Ca/P ratio and cooling rate on the allotropic α↔β-tricalcium phosphate phase transformations. Ceramics International. 44(7). 8249–8256. 29 indexed citations
7.
Fernandes, Hugo R., Anuraag Gaddam, Avito Rebelo, et al.. (2018). Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics for Healthcare Applications in Bone Regeneration and Tissue Engineering. Materials. 11(12). 2530–2530. 273 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Ferreira, Manuel Marques, Ana Brito, Daniela Brazete, et al.. (2018). Doping β-TCP as a Strategy for Enhancing the Regenerative Potential of Composite β-TCP—Alkali-Free Bioactive Glass Bone Grafts. Experimental Study in Rats. Materials. 12(1). 4–4. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026