Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Zimmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Zimmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Zimmer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Zimmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Zimmer. The network helps show where Daniel Zimmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Zimmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Zimmer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Zimmer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Zimmer. Daniel Zimmer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stephan, Andreas, et al.. (2016). Individual Sanctions for Competition Law Infringements: Pros, Cons and Challenges. Concurrences Review. 14–44.2 indexed citations
Zimmer, Daniel. (2011). Consumer Welfare, Economic Freedom and the Moral Quality of Competition Law – Comments on Gregory Werden and Victor Vanberg. Chapters.
8.
Zimmer, Daniel, et al.. (2010). Die Banken-Beihilfenkontrolle der Europäischen Kommission: Wettbewerbsschutz oder Marktdesign?. 60(2). 142–156.1 indexed citations
Zimmer, Daniel, et al.. (2009). Das Cartesio-Urteil des EuGH: Rück- oder Fortschritt für das internationale Gesellschaftsrecht?. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift: NJW. 62(9). 545–550.2 indexed citations
Zimmer, Daniel, et al.. (2005). Private Durchsetzung des Kartellrechts und der Vorschlag zur "Rom II-VO". 16(4). 149–154.1 indexed citations
17.
Fuchs, Andreas, Hans-Peter Schwintowski, & Daniel Zimmer. (2004). Wirtschafts- und Privatrecht im Spannungsfeld von Privatautonomie, Wettbewerb und Regulierung : Festschrift für Ulrich Immenga zum 70. Geburtstag. C.H.Beck eBooks.1 indexed citations
18.
Zimmer, Daniel. (1996). Internationales Gesellschaftsrecht : das Kollisionsrecht der Gesellschaften und sein Verhältnis zum internationalen Kapitalmarktrecht und zum internationalen Unternehmensrecht.1 indexed citations
19.
Bruand, Ary & Daniel Zimmer. (1992). Relation entre la capacité d'échange cationique et le volume poral dans les sols argileux : incidences sur la morphologie de la phase argileuse à l'échelle des assemblages élémentaires. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 315(2). 223–229.7 indexed citations
20.
Zimmer, Daniel, et al.. (1991). Importance et déterminisme des infiltrations profondes en luvisols-redoxisols drainés. Incidence sur les modalités de drainage. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 29(4). 321–337.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.