Daniel Tilia

853 citations
39 papers · 649 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Tilia

38 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers

Daniel Tilia
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Ophthalmology 254
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 464
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 448
  • Epidemiology 421
  • Dermatology 28
Replace Jennie Diec with:
Jennie Diec Australia
Dawn Y. Lam United States
Eef van der Worp United States
Meredith E. Jansen United States
Sandra Franco Portugal
Langis Michaud Canada
Arthur Back Australia
Takushi Kawamorita Japan
Larry J. Davis United States
Sally M. Dillehay United States
Daniel Tilia relative to Jennie Diec Australia Jennie Diec's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jennie Diec · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Tilia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Tilia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Tilia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Tilia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Tilia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Tilia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Tilia. The network helps show where Daniel Tilia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Tilia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Tilia Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Tilia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019133
2 201142
3 201437
4 201832
5 201632
6 201730
7 201330
8 201730
9 201325
10 201525
11 201625
12 201624
13 201620
14 201718
15 201918
16
Quantification of individual proteins in silicone hydrogel contact lens deposits.
201314
17 201813
18 201713
19 202012
20 200910

About Daniel Tilia

Daniel Tilia is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Social Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (29 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (23 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (20 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (254 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (464 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (448 citations), Epidemiology (421 citations) and Dermatology (28 citations). Daniel Tilia has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ravi C. Bakaraju, Jennie Diec, Thomas Naduvilath, Varghese Thomas, Percy Lazon de la Jara, Brien A. Holden, Klaus Ehrmann, Eric Papas, Fabian Conrad and Rebecca Weng. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye and Journal of Optometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact