Daniel Tilia

853 total citations
39 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Daniel Tilia is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Tilia has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 23 papers in Epidemiology and 21 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Daniel Tilia's work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (29 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (23 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (20 papers). Daniel Tilia is often cited by papers focused on Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (29 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (23 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (20 papers). Daniel Tilia collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Daniel Tilia's co-authors include Ravi C. Bakaraju, Jennie Diec, Thomas Naduvilath, Varghese Thomas, Brien A. Holden, Percy Lazon de la Jara, Klaus Ehrmann, Eric Papas, Rebecca Weng and Fabian Conrad and has published in prestigious journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optometry and Vision Science and Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Tilia

38 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Tilia Australia 15 464 448 421 254 48 39 649
Jennie Diec Australia 13 333 0.7× 433 1.0× 211 0.5× 228 0.9× 29 0.6× 31 527
Langis Michaud Canada 15 689 1.5× 547 1.2× 408 1.0× 383 1.5× 21 0.4× 50 856
Meredith E. Jansen United States 11 358 0.8× 397 0.9× 321 0.8× 259 1.0× 43 0.9× 21 565
José‐María Sánchez‐González Spain 15 425 0.9× 334 0.7× 187 0.4× 346 1.4× 21 0.4× 103 710
Paul Gifford Australia 15 562 1.2× 266 0.6× 514 1.2× 302 1.2× 25 0.5× 30 633
Daniela Lopes-Ferreira Portugal 18 694 1.5× 437 1.0× 636 1.5× 383 1.5× 66 1.4× 28 863
Eef van der Worp United States 17 741 1.6× 744 1.7× 370 0.9× 374 1.5× 9 0.2× 40 919
Sandra Franco Portugal 12 243 0.5× 163 0.4× 159 0.4× 198 0.8× 24 0.5× 45 388
Takushi Kawamorita Japan 17 698 1.5× 219 0.5× 569 1.4× 697 2.7× 81 1.7× 54 935
P. SARITA SONI United States 14 473 1.0× 293 0.7× 410 1.0× 281 1.1× 24 0.5× 30 619

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Tilia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Tilia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Tilia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Tilia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Tilia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Tilia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Tilia. The network helps show where Daniel Tilia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Tilia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Tilia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Tilia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Tilia. Daniel Tilia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Fedtke, Cathleen, et al.. (2024). Visual performance of optical films utilizing Spatio‐Temporal Optical Phase technology. Optometry and Vision Science. 101(4). 195–203. 1 indexed citations
3.
Tahhan, Nina, Thomas Naduvilath, & Daniel Tilia. (2023). Comparing children's, teenagers' and young adults' subjective responses to myopia control contact lenses. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 43(3). 418–425. 3 indexed citations
4.
Tilia, Daniel, Ravi C. Bakaraju, Lisa Asper, & Eric Papas. (2021). Associations between Binocular Vision Disorders and Contact Lens Dissatisfaction. Optometry and Vision Science. 98(10). 1160–1168. 8 indexed citations
5.
6.
Fedtke, Cathleen, et al.. (2019). <p>Effect of cylinder power and axis changes on vision in astigmatic participants</p>. Clinical Optometry. Volume 11. 27–38. 6 indexed citations
7.
Tilia, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Visual performance of daily disposable multifocal soft contact lenses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 1793–1793. 1 indexed citations
8.
Tilia, Daniel, Jennie Diec, Cathleen Fedtke, et al.. (2018). Visual performance of myopia control soft contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopes. Clinical Optometry. Volume 10. 75–86. 32 indexed citations
9.
Diec, Jennie, Thomas Naduvilath, & Daniel Tilia. (2018). Subjective Ratings and Satisfaction in Contact Lens Wear. Optometry and Vision Science. 95(3). 256–263. 7 indexed citations
10.
Fedtke, Cathleen, et al.. (2018). Effects of relative negative spherical aberration in single vision contact lens visual performance. Clinical Optometry. Volume 10. 9–17. 6 indexed citations
11.
Sankaridurg, Padmaja, Ravi C. Bakaraju, Judith K. Morgan, et al.. (2017). Novel contact lenses designed to slow progress of myopia: 12 month results. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 2391–2391. 4 indexed citations
12.
Diec, Jennie, Daniel Tilia, & Varghese Thomas. (2017). Comparison of Silicone Hydrogel and Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 44(1). S167–S172. 30 indexed citations
13.
Tilia, Daniel, et al.. (2016). Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal. Journal of Optometry. 10(1). 14–25. 20 indexed citations
14.
Bakaraju, Ravi C., et al.. (2016). Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. 79(2). 73–7. 32 indexed citations
15.
Papas, Eric, Daniel Tilia, John McNally, & Percy Lazon de la Jara. (2015). Ocular Discomfort Responses after Short Periods of Contact Lens Wear. Optometry and Vision Science. 92(6). 665–670. 25 indexed citations
16.
Zhu, Hua, Daniel Tilia, Varghese Thomas, et al.. (2014). The natural history of meibomian glands: Age-related changes in an asymptomatic population. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 21–21. 1 indexed citations
17.
Papas, Eric, et al.. (2013). Consequences of Wear Interruption for Discomfort With Contact Lenses. Optometry and Vision Science. 91(1). 24–31. 30 indexed citations
18.
Tilia, Daniel, et al.. (2013). Effect of Lens and Solution Choice on the Comfort of Contact Lens Wearers. Optometry and Vision Science. 90(5). 411–418. 25 indexed citations
19.
Tilia, Daniel, Percy Lazon de la Jara, Rebecca Weng, Thomas Naduvilath, & Mark Willcox. (2013). Short-Term Clinical Comparison of Two Dual-Disinfection Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 40(1). 7–11. 5 indexed citations
20.
Diec, Jennie, Vicki Evans, Daniel Tilia, et al.. (2011). Comparison of Ocular Comfort, Vision, and SICS During Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Daily Wear. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 38(1). 2–6. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennie Diec Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Langis Michaud Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Meredith E. Jansen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José‐María Sánchez‐González Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul Gifford Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniela Lopes-Ferreira Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eef van der Worp Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandra Franco Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Takushi Kawamorita Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. SARITA SONI
Rankless by CCL
2026