Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Theory of Peasant Economy.
1968894 citationsMaurice Dobb, A. V. Chayanov et al.The Economic Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Thorner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Thorner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Thorner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Thorner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Thorner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Thorner. The network helps show where Daniel Thorner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Thorner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Thorner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Thorner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Thorner. Daniel Thorner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sobhan, Rehman, et al.. (1990). From Aid Dependence to Self-reliance: Development Options for Bangladesh (Price:. Medical Entomology and Zoology.7 indexed citations
2.
Thorner, Daniel, et al.. (1986). A.V. Chayanov on the theory of peasant economy. University of Wisconsin Press eBooks.117 indexed citations
3.
Thorner, Daniel. (1980). The shaping of modern India. Medical Entomology and Zoology.11 indexed citations
Dobb, Maurice, A. V. Chayanov, Daniel Thorner, Basile Kerblay, & R. E. F. Smith. (1968). The Theory of Peasant Economy.. The Economic Journal. 78(310). 469–469.894 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Thorner, Daniel. (1967). Social and Economic Studies of Dr Mann. Economic and political weekly. 2(13).
Thorner, Daniel. (1964). Agricultural cooperatives in India : a field report.7 indexed citations
11.
Thorner, Daniel, et al.. (1964). Land and Labor in India. Revue économique. 15(3). 491–491.2 indexed citations
12.
Morris, Morris David, Daniel Thorner, & Alice Thorner. (1963). Land and Labour in India.. The Economic History Review. 15(3). 594–594.4 indexed citations
13.
Thorner, Daniel & Alice Thorner. (1962). Land and labour in India. Medical Entomology and Zoology.52 indexed citations
Thorner, Daniel. (1956). The agrarian prospect in India : five lectures on land reform delivered in 1955 at the Delhi School of Economics.11 indexed citations
17.
Barber, Bernard, Joseph R. Strayer, Edwin O. Reischauer, et al.. (1956). Feudalism in History.. American Sociological Review. 21(4). 518–518.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.