Daniel T. Williams
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Neurology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stanley FahnStuart C. YudofskyB. FordThaddeus S. WalczakClarice J. KestenbaumMark L. ScheuerSavvas PapacostasDavid Adams
- Topics
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (9 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers)Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaCyprus
In The Last Decade
Daniel T. Williams
21 papers receiving 832 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 608
- Clinical Psychology 276
- Philosophy 169
- Neurology 146
- Cognitive Neuroscience 132
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Williams. The network helps show where Daniel T. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel T. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel T. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel T. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel T. Williams. Daniel T. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | Treatment issues in psychogenic-neuropsychiatric movement disorders. | 8 |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 148 | |
| 9 | Phenomenology and psychopathology related to psychogenic movement disorders. | 183 |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | Handbook of clinical assessment of children and adolescents | 52 |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 119 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Daniel T. Williams
Daniel T. Williams is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (9 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (608 citations), Philosophy (169 citations) and Clinical Psychology (276 citations). Daniel T. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Stanley Fahn, Stuart C. Yudofsky, B. Ford, Thaddeus S. Walczak, Clarice J. Kestenbaum, Mark L. Scheuer, Savvas Papacostas, David Adams, Jonathan Silver and Manmohan Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, American Journal of Psychiatry and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.