Daniel Stevens

1.4k citations
56 papers · 781 indexed · h-index 16

Daniel Stevens

52 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

Daniel Stevens
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Communication 203
  • Political Science and International Relations 366
  • Gender Studies 124
  • Sociology and Political Science 513
  • Development 18
Replace Wanning Sun with:
Wanning Sun Australia
Shaul R. Shenhav Israel
Brigitte L. Nacos United States
Amy Erica Smith United States
Marisa Abrajano United States
Wenfang Tang United States
Erik Bleich United States
Antoine Banks United States
Kenneth O’Reilly United States
Luís Felipe Miguel Brazil
Daniel Stevens relative to Wanning Sun Australia Wanning Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wanning Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Stevens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Stevens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Stevens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Stevens. The network helps show where Daniel Stevens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Stevens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Stevens Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Stevens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20233
3 202212
4 20213
5 20204
6 20203
7 201620
8 20156
9 2015113
10 20151
11 201514
12
Truth or Consequences? : Character and Swing Voters in the 2000 Election
20141
13 201441
14 201410
15 20139
16 201211
17
Not the Whole Story: From Punditry to Partisan Processing on the Power of the Truth Test
20091
18 200710
19 20066
20 200649

About Daniel Stevens

Daniel Stevens is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 56 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (33 papers), Social Media and Politics (17 papers), Media Influence and Politics (10 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (5 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (5 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (203 citations), Political Science and International Relations (366 citations), Gender Studies (124 citations), Sociology and Political Science (513 citations) and Development (18 citations). Daniel Stevens has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nick Vaughan‐Williams, Susan Banducci, Benjamin G. Bishin, Bárbara Allen, John L. Sullivan, John L. Sullivan, George E. Marcus, Elizabeth Theiss‐Morse, Robert R. Barr and Jeffrey A. Karp. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties, Electoral Studies, British Journal of Political Science, Political Behavior and European Journal of Political Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026