Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Causal Effects of Father Absence
2013364 citationsSara McLanahan, Daniel Schneider et al.profile →
Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being
2019283 citationsDaniel Schneider, Kristen HarknettAmerican Sociological Reviewprofile →
Income Inequality and Class Divides in Parental Investments
2018161 citationsDaniel Schneider, Orestes P Hastings et al.American Sociological Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schneider
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schneider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schneider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schneider more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schneider
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schneider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schneider. The network helps show where Daniel Schneider may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Schneider
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Schneider.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Schneider based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Schneider. Daniel Schneider is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schneider, Daniel, Orestes P Hastings, & Joe LaBriola. (2018). Income Inequality and Class Divides in Parental Investments. American Sociological Review. 83(3). 475–507.161 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Schneider, Daniel. (2017). Income Volatility in the Service Sector: Contours, Causes, and Consequences.4 indexed citations
12.
Schneider, Daniel, et al.. (2016). Pistes réflexives sur l'apprentissage de la méthodologie de la recherche en technologie éducative. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).1 indexed citations
Schneider, Daniel. (2011). Wealth and the Marital Divide. American Journal of Sociology. 117(2). 627–667.125 indexed citations
18.
Tufano, Peter & Daniel Schneider. (2009). Using financial innovation to support savers: from coercion to excitement. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 6–8.5 indexed citations
19.
Beverly, Sondra G., Peter Tufano, & Daniel Schneider. (2005). Splitting Tax Refunds and Building Savings: An Empirical Test. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 111–162.6 indexed citations
20.
Schneider, Daniel, et al.. (1981). Le droit en action : étude de mise en oeuvre de la législation fédérale sur l'acquisition d'immeubles par des personnes domiciliées à l'étranger : rapport final au Fonds national (requête n° 4.270.0.78.06). Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.