Daniel Schlegel

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 763 citations indexed

About

Daniel Schlegel is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Mechanical Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Schlegel has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 763 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 9 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 5 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Recurrent topics in Daniel Schlegel's work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis (4 papers). Daniel Schlegel is often cited by papers focused on Semantic Web and Ontologies (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis (4 papers). Daniel Schlegel collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Romania. Daniel Schlegel's co-authors include Craig Upson, David H. Laidlaw, Robert F. Gurwitz, Andries van Dam, Grégoire Ficheur, Stuart C. Shapiro, Peter L. Elkin, Rakesh Nagi, C. Langlade and Leslie J. Bisson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Chemistry - A European Journal and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Schlegel

33 papers receiving 684 citations

Hit Papers

The application visualization system: a computational env... 1989 2026 2001 2013 1989 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Schlegel United States 9 309 200 179 131 121 36 763
Shusen Liu United States 15 366 1.2× 53 0.3× 34 0.2× 27 0.2× 335 2.8× 37 1.0k
Gleb Gusev Russia 14 188 0.6× 34 0.2× 39 0.2× 17 0.1× 163 1.3× 54 639
Peter M. Dew United Kingdom 13 83 0.3× 37 0.2× 105 0.6× 30 0.2× 42 0.3× 78 573
Jong Youl Choi United States 13 63 0.2× 14 0.1× 343 1.9× 91 0.7× 186 1.5× 67 644
Jason Lee United States 15 128 0.4× 14 0.1× 667 3.7× 102 0.8× 411 3.4× 35 1.0k
Achim Streit Germany 15 84 0.3× 10 0.1× 654 3.7× 185 1.4× 189 1.6× 110 1.1k
Yifan Sun United States 16 210 0.7× 12 0.1× 327 1.8× 15 0.1× 162 1.3× 78 807
Jun Yuan China 15 386 1.2× 13 0.1× 51 0.3× 16 0.1× 267 2.2× 36 770
Mohammad Zubair United States 17 99 0.3× 7 0.0× 409 2.3× 34 0.3× 216 1.8× 120 925
Baogang Wei China 16 200 0.6× 15 0.1× 66 0.4× 7 0.1× 363 3.0× 74 754

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schlegel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schlegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schlegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schlegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schlegel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schlegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schlegel. The network helps show where Daniel Schlegel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Schlegel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Schlegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Schlegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Schlegel. Daniel Schlegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schlegel, Daniel, et al.. (2025). Prediction and experimental validation of cutting forces in ball end milling of aluminum 7075-T6 alloy. Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal. 19(8). 68–76.
2.
Schlegel, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Diagnoses per Encounter by Telephone, Televideo, and In-Office Visits. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 35(3). 491–496. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dumas, Thomas, E. Mendès, Pier Lorenzo Solari, et al.. (2020). Electrochemical and Spectroscopic Study of EuIII and EuII Coordination in the 1‐Ethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide Ionic Liquid. Chemistry - A European Journal. 26(63). 14385–14396. 10 indexed citations
5.
Schlegel, Daniel, et al.. (2020). What's Happening in Your Head: Overcoming Our Assumptions to Work Better Together. MedEdPORTAL. 16. 11034–11034. 2 indexed citations
6.
Schlegel, Daniel, Kate Gordon, Carmelo Gaudioso, & Mor Peleg. (2019). Clinical Tractor: A Framework for Automatic Natural Language Understanding of Clinical Practice Guidelines.. PubMed. 2019. 784–793. 4 indexed citations
7.
Schlegel, Daniel & Grégoire Ficheur. (2017). Secondary Use of Patient Data: Review of the Literature Published in 2016. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. 26(1). 68–71. 18 indexed citations
8.
Langlade, C., et al.. (2017). Influence of friction stir process parameters on surface quality of aluminum alloy A2017. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 94. 2006–2006. 3 indexed citations
9.
Elkin, Peter L., et al.. (2016). Recruiting Participants to Local Clinical Trials using Ontology and the IoT. Studies in health technology and informatics. 221. 119–119. 1 indexed citations
10.
Shapiro, Stuart C. & Daniel Schlegel. (2015). Use of background knowledge in natural language understanding for information fusion. 901–907. 3 indexed citations
11.
Schlegel, Daniel & Stuart C. Shapiro. (2014). The `Ah Ha!' Moment : When Possible, Answering the Currently Unanswerable using Focused Reasoning. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 1 indexed citations
12.
Schlegel, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Systemic test and evaluation of a hard+soft information fusion framework: Challenges and current approaches. International Conference on Information Fusion. 1–8. 12 indexed citations
13.
Langlade, C., et al.. (2014). Study of stirred layers on 316L steel created by friction stir processing. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 63. 12007–12007. 2 indexed citations
14.
Shapiro, Stewart & Daniel Schlegel. (2013). Natural Language Understanding for Soft Information Fusion. 4 indexed citations
15.
Schlegel, Daniel & Stuart C. Shapiro. (2013). Concurrent Reasoning with Inference Graphs. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 27(1). 1637–1638. 1 indexed citations
16.
Schlegel, Daniel. (2013). Concurrent Inference Graphs. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 27(1). 1680–1681. 2 indexed citations
17.
Nagi, Rakesh, et al.. (2012). Towards hard+soft data fusion: Processing architecture and implementation for the joint fusion and analysis of hard and soft intelligence data. International Conference on Information Fusion. 955–962. 19 indexed citations
18.
Lebaal, Nadhir, et al.. (2010). Automatic Optimization of Air Conduct Design Using Experimental Data and Numerical Results. International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. 4(2). 77–83. 5 indexed citations
19.
Upson, Craig, et al.. (1989). The application visualization system: a computational environment for scientific visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 9(4). 30–42. 568 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Fischer, Wilhelm Anton, et al.. (1970). EXAMINATION OF $alpha$/$gamma$ TRANSFORMATION IN VERY PURE BINARY ALLOYS OF IRON WITH MOLYBDENUM, VANADIUM, TUNGSTEN, NIOBIUM, TANTALUM, ZIRCONIUM, AND COBALT.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026