Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The application visualization system: a computational environment for scientific visualization
1989568 citationsCraig Upson, David H. Laidlaw et al.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applicationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schlegel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schlegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schlegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schlegel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schlegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schlegel. The network helps show where Daniel Schlegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Schlegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Schlegel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Schlegel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Schlegel. Daniel Schlegel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schlegel, Daniel, Kate Gordon, Carmelo Gaudioso, & Mor Peleg. (2019). Clinical Tractor: A Framework for Automatic Natural Language Understanding of Clinical Practice Guidelines.. PubMed. 2019. 784–793.4 indexed citations
Shapiro, Stuart C. & Daniel Schlegel. (2015). Use of background knowledge in natural language understanding for information fusion. 901–907.3 indexed citations
11.
Schlegel, Daniel & Stuart C. Shapiro. (2014). The `Ah Ha!' Moment : When Possible, Answering the Currently Unanswerable using Focused Reasoning. Cognitive Science. 36(36).1 indexed citations
12.
Schlegel, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Systemic test and evaluation of a hard+soft information fusion framework: Challenges and current approaches. International Conference on Information Fusion. 1–8.12 indexed citations
Shapiro, Stewart & Daniel Schlegel. (2013). Natural Language Understanding for Soft Information Fusion.4 indexed citations
15.
Schlegel, Daniel & Stuart C. Shapiro. (2013). Concurrent Reasoning with Inference Graphs. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 27(1). 1637–1638.1 indexed citations
16.
Schlegel, Daniel. (2013). Concurrent Inference Graphs. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 27(1). 1680–1681.2 indexed citations
17.
Nagi, Rakesh, et al.. (2012). Towards hard+soft data fusion: Processing architecture and implementation for the joint fusion and analysis of hard and soft intelligence data. International Conference on Information Fusion. 955–962.19 indexed citations
Upson, Craig, et al.. (1989). The application visualization system: a computational environment for scientific visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 9(4). 30–42.568 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Fischer, Wilhelm Anton, et al.. (1970). EXAMINATION OF $alpha$/$gamma$ TRANSFORMATION IN VERY PURE BINARY ALLOYS OF IRON WITH MOLYBDENUM, VANADIUM, TUNGSTEN, NIOBIUM, TANTALUM, ZIRCONIUM, AND COBALT.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.