Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Development and Validation of a Screening Instrument for Bipolar Spectrum Disorder: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire
20001.1k citationsRobert M. A. Hirschfeld, Janet B. W. Williams et al.American Journal of Psychiatryprofile →
Effectiveness of Adjunctive Antidepressant Treatment for Bipolar Depression
2007567 citationsRoy H. Perlis, Andrew A. Nierenberg et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rapport
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rapport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rapport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rapport more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rapport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rapport. The network helps show where Daniel Rapport may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Rapport
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Rapport.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Rapport based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Rapport. Daniel Rapport is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Perlis, Roy H., Andrew A. Nierenberg, Joseph R. Calabrese, et al.. (2007). Effectiveness of Adjunctive Antidepressant Treatment for Bipolar Depression. New England Journal of Medicine. 356(17). 1711–1722.567 indexed citations breakdown →
Calabrese, Joseph R., Melvin D. Shelton, Daniel Rapport, Susan E. Kimmel, & Omar Elhaj. (2002). Long-term treatment of bipolar disorder with lamotrigine.. PubMed. 63 Suppl 10. 18–22.35 indexed citations
10.
Calabrese, Joseph R., Melvin D. Shelton, Daniel Rapport, & Susan E. Kimmel. (2002). Bipolar disorders and the effectiveness of novel anticonvulsants.. PubMed. 63 Suppl 3. 5–9.35 indexed citations
11.
Wisner, Katherine L., James M. Perel, Kathleen Peindl, et al.. (2001). Prevention of Recurrent Postpartum Depression. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 62(2). 82–86.140 indexed citations
Hirschfeld, Robert M. A., Janet B. W. Williams, Robert L. Spitzer, et al.. (2000). Development and Validation of a Screening Instrument for Bipolar Spectrum Disorder: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire. American Journal of Psychiatry. 157(11). 1873–1875.1127 indexed citations breakdown →
Fatemi, S. Hossein, Daniel Rapport, Joseph R. Calabrese, & Paul Thuras. (1997). Lamotrigine in Rapid-Cycling Bipolar Disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 58(12). 522–527.101 indexed citations
Calabrese, Joseph R., Daniel Rapport, Susan E. Kimmel, Becky Reece, & M J Woyshville. (1993). Rapid cycling bipolar disorder and its treatment with valproate.. PubMed. 38(3 Suppl 2). S57–61.45 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.