Daniel R. Graham

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Daniel R. Graham is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel R. Graham has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Daniel R. Graham's work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (5 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers). Daniel R. Graham is often cited by papers focused on Metal complexes synthesis and properties (5 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers). Daniel R. Graham collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel R. Graham's co-authors include David S. Sigman, Andrew M. Stern, Karl Reich, Laura E. Marshall, Julie A. Gegner, Frederick W. Dahlquist, Amy F. Roth and L M Pope and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Daniel R. Graham

7 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Oxygen-dependent cleavage of DNA by the 1,10-phenanthroli... 1979 2026 1994 2010 1979 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel R. Graham United States 7 781 615 328 220 183 7 1.2k
Cynthia M. Dupureur United States 23 1.2k 1.5× 557 0.9× 394 1.2× 173 0.8× 69 0.4× 64 1.5k
Thomas W. Bruice United States 14 742 1.0× 287 0.5× 232 0.7× 65 0.3× 85 0.5× 19 1.0k
Margaret O’Gara United States 16 748 1.0× 255 0.4× 199 0.6× 60 0.3× 119 0.7× 24 1.2k
Carla C. Oliveira Brazil 21 1.0k 1.3× 206 0.3× 139 0.4× 116 0.5× 56 0.3× 48 1.4k
H. Venner Germany 21 731 0.9× 241 0.4× 147 0.4× 40 0.2× 50 0.3× 81 998
Richard J. Guajardo United States 13 476 0.6× 158 0.3× 116 0.4× 134 0.6× 227 1.2× 15 726
Annick Spassky France 22 1.6k 2.1× 203 0.3× 136 0.4× 1.0k 4.6× 70 0.4× 36 2.0k
Daphne Wahnon Canada 10 541 0.7× 230 0.4× 203 0.6× 29 0.1× 103 0.6× 11 838
Kyriacos Petratos Greece 19 1.7k 2.2× 145 0.2× 177 0.5× 285 1.3× 123 0.7× 47 2.0k
Gaoyi Xiao United States 14 523 0.7× 103 0.2× 132 0.4× 82 0.4× 60 0.3× 17 828

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Graham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Graham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Graham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Graham. The network helps show where Daniel R. Graham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel R. Graham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel R. Graham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel R. Graham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel R. Graham. Daniel R. Graham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Gegner, Julie A., Daniel R. Graham, Amy F. Roth, & Frederick W. Dahlquist. (1992). Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. Cell. 70(6). 975–982. 298 indexed citations
2.
Graham, Daniel R. & David S. Sigman. (1984). Zinc ion in Escherichia coli DNA polymerase: a reinvestigation. Inorganic Chemistry. 23(25). 4188–4191. 25 indexed citations
3.
Pope, L M, Karl Reich, Daniel R. Graham, & David S. Sigman. (1982). Products of DNA cleavage by the 1,10-phenanthroline-copper complex. Inhibitors of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I.. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 257(20). 12121–12128. 64 indexed citations
4.
Marshall, Laura E., Daniel R. Graham, Karl Reich, & David S. Sigman. (1981). Cleavage of deoxyribonucleic acid by the 1,10-phenanthroline-cuprous complex. Hydrogen peroxide requirement and primary and secondary structure specificity. Biochemistry. 20(2). 244–250. 205 indexed citations
5.
Reich, Karl, Laura E. Marshall, Daniel R. Graham, & David S. Sigman. (1981). Cleavage of DNA by the 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion complex. Superoxide mediates the reaction dependent on NADH and hydrogen peroxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 103(12). 3582–3584. 52 indexed citations
6.
Graham, Daniel R., Laura E. Marshall, Karl Reich, & David S. Sigman. (1980). Cleavage of DNA by coordination complexes. Superoxide formation in the oxidation of 1,10-phenanthroline-cuprous complexes by oxygen - relevance to DNA-cleavage reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 102(16). 5419–5421. 98 indexed citations
7.
Sigman, David S., et al.. (1979). Oxygen-dependent cleavage of DNA by the 1,10-phenanthroline . cuprous complex. Inhibition of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I.. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 254(24). 12269–12272. 476 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026