Daniel P. Scantlebury
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Plant Science
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Tony GambleDavid ZarkowerJoshua LynchTariq EzazBrendan J. PintoStuart V. NielsenTimothy E. HighamGuarino Rinaldi Colli
- Topics
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers)Plant and animal studies (5 papers)Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesMolecular Biology and EvolutionMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaMexico
In The Last Decade
Daniel P. Scantlebury
13 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Genetics 260
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 152
- Global and Planetary Change 103
- Plant Science 92
- Molecular Biology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Scantlebury
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Scantlebury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Scantlebury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Scantlebury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. Scantlebury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Scantlebury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Scantlebury. The network helps show where Daniel P. Scantlebury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel P. Scantlebury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel P. Scantlebury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel P. Scantlebury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel P. Scantlebury. Daniel P. Scantlebury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 196 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 |
About Daniel P. Scantlebury
Daniel P. Scantlebury is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 13 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (43 citations), Genetics (260 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (152 citations). Daniel P. Scantlebury has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Tony Gamble, David Zarkower, Joshua Lynch, Tariq Ezaz, Brendan J. Pinto, Stuart V. Nielsen, Timothy E. Higham, Guarino Rinaldi Colli, Juan D. Daza and Anthony P. Russell. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Molecular Biology and Evolution and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.