Daniel M. Wells

696 citations
29 papers · 609 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel M. Wells

29 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers

Daniel M. Wells
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 462
  • Inorganic Chemistry 345
  • Condensed Matter Physics 177
  • Materials Chemistry 332
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 33
Replace Jaewook Baek with:
Jaewook Baek United States
Michael R. Marvel United States
Ninh Nguyen France
Hegui Zang China
Xinan Chang China
A. F. Bovina Russia
Hanskarl Müller‐Buschbaum Germany
L. G. Akselrud Ukraine
K. Bluhm Germany
Grigori V. Vajenine Germany
Daniel M. Wells relative to Jaewook Baek United States Jaewook Baek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jaewook Baek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Wells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Wells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Wells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Wells. The network helps show where Daniel M. Wells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Wells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Wells Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Wells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002144
2 200257
3 200246
4 200240
5 200336
6 200229
7 200827
8 201226
9 201723
10 201022
11 201022
12 200921
13 200815
14 202314
15 200910
16 20109
17 20099
18 20059
19 20098
20 20108

About Daniel M. Wells

Daniel M. Wells is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystal Structures and Properties (15 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (10 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (8 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (7 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (6 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (5 papers) and Nuclear materials and radiation effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (462 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (345 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (177 citations), Materials Chemistry (332 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (33 citations). Daniel M. Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. Albrecht‐Schmitt, Richard E. Sykora, James A. Ibers, Kang Min Ok, P. Shiv Halasyamani, D. E. Ellis, S. Skanthakumar, L. Soderholm, Geng Bang Jin and Jiyong Yao. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Nuclear Engineering and Technology and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact