Daniel M. Laby

633 total citations
32 papers, 420 citations indexed

About

Daniel M. Laby is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel M. Laby has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 420 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Ophthalmology, 10 papers in Epidemiology and 9 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Recurrent topics in Daniel M. Laby's work include Sports Performance and Training (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). Daniel M. Laby is often cited by papers focused on Sports Performance and Training (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). Daniel M. Laby collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Daniel M. Laby's co-authors include David Kirschen, Arthur L. Rosenbaum, Lawrence G. Appelbaum, Paul N. DeLand, Usha Govindarajulu, John L. Davidson, Salim I. Butrus, Ahmed A. Hidayat, Mohammed Ashraf and Fadi P. Nasrallah and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Ophthalmology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel M. Laby

32 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel M. Laby United States 11 125 125 120 82 78 32 420
Kristine Dalton Canada 12 54 0.4× 82 0.7× 46 0.4× 68 0.8× 103 1.3× 35 369
Lluïsa Quevedo i Junyent Spain 11 77 0.6× 32 0.3× 49 0.4× 145 1.8× 228 2.9× 46 430
Anna Przekoracka‐Krawczyk Poland 10 233 1.9× 8 0.1× 50 0.4× 36 0.4× 91 1.2× 39 357
Alexandra Stein Germany 11 121 1.0× 27 0.2× 8 0.1× 86 1.0× 90 1.2× 30 375
Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur Iran 20 133 1.1× 41 0.3× 55 0.5× 707 8.6× 628 8.1× 97 1.2k
Arkady Selenow United States 12 286 2.3× 15 0.1× 14 0.1× 176 2.1× 396 5.1× 24 556
W. David Thomson United Kingdom 9 87 0.7× 9 0.1× 6 0.1× 97 1.2× 81 1.0× 18 329
Beatriz Antona Spain 15 166 1.3× 20 0.2× 8 0.1× 193 2.4× 268 3.4× 28 503
D Leroy France 13 93 0.7× 348 2.8× 164 1.4× 23 0.3× 8 0.1× 31 567
Linda Colpa Canada 12 245 2.0× 5 0.0× 13 0.1× 144 1.8× 242 3.1× 18 400

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Laby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Laby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Laby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Laby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Laby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Laby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Laby. The network helps show where Daniel M. Laby may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel M. Laby

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel M. Laby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel M. Laby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel M. Laby. Daniel M. Laby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Laby, Daniel M. & Lawrence G. Appelbaum. (2021). Review: Vision and On‐field Performance: A Critical Review of Visual Assessment and Training Studies with Athletes. Optometry and Vision Science. 98(7). 723–731. 30 indexed citations
2.
Kirschen, David & Daniel M. Laby. (2021). The Uses of Vision Data in Selecting Players for the Major League Baseball Draft. Optometry and Vision Science. 98(7). 809–814. 1 indexed citations
3.
Laby, Daniel M.. (2020). Visual Fixation in NBA Free-Throws and the Relationship to On-Court Performance. 2(1). e1–e7. 4 indexed citations
4.
Laby, Daniel M., David Kirschen, Usha Govindarajulu, & Paul N. DeLand. (2019). The Effect of Visual Function on the Batting Performance of Professional Baseball Players. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 16847–16847. 20 indexed citations
5.
Laby, Daniel M., David Kirschen, Usha Govindarajulu, & Paul N. DeLand. (2018). The Hand‐eye Coordination of Professional Baseball Players: The Relationship to Batting. Optometry and Vision Science. 95(7). 557–567. 34 indexed citations
6.
Laby, Daniel M.. (2018). Case Report: Use of Sports and Performance Vision Training to Benefit a Low Vision Patient's Function. Optometry and Vision Science. 95(9). 898–901. 3 indexed citations
7.
Laby, Daniel M. & David Kirschen. (2017). The Refractive Error of Professional Baseball Players. Optometry and Vision Science. 94(5). 564–573. 6 indexed citations
8.
Kirschen, David, Daniel M. Laby, & David Meadows. (2014). A Novel Way to Assess Visual Performance in Elite Athletes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 5606–5606. 2 indexed citations
9.
Laby, Daniel M., David Kirschen, David Meadows, & Robert W. Massof. (2014). A test of visual function combining size, contrast and presentation time. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 4576–4576. 1 indexed citations
10.
Laby, Daniel M. & David Kirschen. (2011). Thoughts on Ocular Dominance—Is It Actually a Preference?. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 37(3). 140–144. 15 indexed citations
11.
Laby, Daniel M., et al.. (2011). The Visual Function of Olympic-Level Athletes—An Initial Report. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 37(3). 116–122. 44 indexed citations
12.
Kirschen, David & Daniel M. Laby. (2011). The Role of Sports Vision in Eye Care Today. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 37(3). 127–130. 21 indexed citations
13.
Kirschen, David, Daniel M. Laby, Matthew P. Kirschen, Raymond A. Applegate, & Larry N. Thibos. (2010). Optical aberrations in professional baseball players. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 36(3). 396–401. 4 indexed citations
14.
Repka, Michael X., Raymond T. Kraker, Roy W. Beck, et al.. (2010). A Pilot Study of levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in children 8 to 17 years old. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 14(1). e6–e7. 1 indexed citations
15.
Laby, Daniel M., et al.. (1998). The effect of ocular dominance on the performance of professional baseball players. Ophthalmology. 105(5). 864–866. 17 indexed citations
16.
Laby, Daniel M., et al.. (1998). Grand rounds #52: a case of a residual left exotropia and hypertropia after previous surgery for a third nerve palsy.. PubMed. 13(4). 284–92. 2 indexed citations
17.
Laby, Daniel M., et al.. (1996). The Visual Function of Professional Baseball Players. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 122(4). 476–485. 72 indexed citations
18.
Butrus, Salim I., et al.. (1995). Increased Numbers of Mast Cells in Pterygia. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 119(2). 236–237. 27 indexed citations
19.
Laby, Daniel M. & Arthur L. Rosenbaum. (1994). Adjustable Vertical Rectus Muscle Transposition Surgery. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 31(2). 75–78. 34 indexed citations
20.
Laby, Daniel M., Fadi P. Nasrallah, Salim I. Butrus, & Paul V. Whitmore. (1993). Treatment of outer retinal necrosis in AIDS Patients. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 231(5). 271–273. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026