Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Carter
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Carter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Carter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Carter. The network helps show where Daniel L. Carter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel L. Carter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel L. Carter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel L. Carter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel L. Carter. Daniel L. Carter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carter, Daniel L., et al.. (2018). Safety Evaluation of Protected Left-Turn Phasing and Leading Pedestrian Intervals on Pedestrian Safety.1 indexed citations
Madsen, Matthew D., Kirk W. Davies, Chad S. Boyd, et al.. (2013). Restoring North America’s Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystem Using Seed Enhancement Technologies. UKnowledge (University of Kentucky). 393–401.8 indexed citations
Srinivasan, Raghavan, Bhagwant Persaud, Kimberly Eccles, Daniel L. Carter, & Jongdae Baek. (2010). Safety Evaluation of Improved Curve Delineation with Signing Enhancements. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.3 indexed citations
11.
Cunningham, Christopher, et al.. (2010). Economic Effects of Access Management Techniques in North Carolina. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.
12.
Harkey, D L, Daniel L. Carter, Janet M. Barlow, & Billie Louise Bentzen. (2007). Accessible Pedestrian Signals: A Guide to Best Practices.13 indexed citations
13.
Carter, Daniel L.. (2007). Factors Contributing to Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes on Rural Highways. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.14 indexed citations
14.
Harkey, D L, et al.. (2007). Guidelines for Accessible Pedestrian Signals.1 indexed citations
15.
Harkey, D L, et al.. (2007). Model Minimum Inventory of Roadway Elements--MMIRE.3 indexed citations
16.
Carter, Daniel L., W W Hunter, Charles V. Zegeer, & Jill R. Stewart. (2007). Pedestrian and Bicyclist Intersection Safety Indices: User Guide.2 indexed citations
17.
Carter, Daniel L., W W Hunter, Charles V. Zegeer, Jill R. Stewart, & Herman F. Huang. (2007). Bicyclist Intersection Safety Index. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2031(1). 18–24.37 indexed citations
18.
Zegeer, Charles V., Daniel L. Carter, W W Hunter, et al.. (2006). Index for Assessing Pedestrian Safety at Intersections. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1982(1). 76–83.18 indexed citations
Carter, Daniel L., W W Hunter, Charles V. Zegeer, Jill R. Stewart, & Herman F. Huang. (2006). Pedestrian and Bicyclist Intersection Safety Indices: Final Report.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.