Daniel J. Larkin

5.1k citations
72 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Larkin

69 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Larkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 781
  • Ecological Modeling 175
  • Ecology 768
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 581
  • Insect Science 248
Replace Valentin H. Klaus with:
Valentin H. Klaus Switzerland
Jes Hines Germany
Lorna J. Cole United Kingdom
Thibaud Decaëns France
Markus Bernhardt‐Römermann Germany
Yunhui Liu China
Florence Dubs France
Arne Cierjacks Germany
Pedro Martins da Silva Portugal
Thomas Bolger Ireland
Daniel J. Larkin relative to Valentin H. Klaus Switzerland Valentin H. Klaus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Valentin H. Klaus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Larkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Larkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Larkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Larkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Larkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Larkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Larkin. The network helps show where Daniel J. Larkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Larkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Larkin Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Larkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011221
2 201794
3 200992
4 201187
5
Fate and effects of diazinon.
200066
6 201164
7 201760
8 201152
9 201549
10 201844
11 201843
12 202040
13 201638
14 201537
15 200836
16 201536
17 201635
18 201335
19 201835
20 201731

About Daniel J. Larkin

Daniel J. Larkin is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (42 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (19 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (9 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (7 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (781 citations), Ecological Modeling (175 citations), Ecology (768 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (581 citations) and Insect Science (248 citations). Daniel J. Larkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca K. Tonietto, Jeremie B. Fant, Nancy C. Tuchman, John S. Ascher, Pamela Geddes, Shane C. Lishawa, Andrew L. Hipp, Ranjan Muthukrishnan, Rebecca S. Barak and Ronald S. Tjeerdema. Their work appears in journals such as Aquatic Botany, Journal of Applied Ecology, Ecology and Evolution, Restoration Ecology and Wetlands.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact