Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Hoppe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Hoppe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Hoppe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Hoppe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Hoppe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Hoppe. The network helps show where Daniel J. Hoppe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel J. Hoppe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel J. Hoppe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel J. Hoppe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel J. Hoppe. Daniel J. Hoppe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2012). A Low-Cost Water Vapor Radiometer for Deep Space Network Media Calibration. 1–13.1 indexed citations
7.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2010). Integrated RF/Optical Ground Station Technology Challenges. 1–38.3 indexed citations
8.
Kangaslahti, Pekka, et al.. (2009). Advanced Component Development to Enable Low-Mass, Low-Power High-Frequency Microwave Radiometers for Coastal Wet-Tropospheric Correction on SWOT. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009.3 indexed citations
9.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2008). High-Power Upgrade of the Three-Frequency (7.2-/8.4-/32-Gigahertz) Deep Space Network Feed: Design Phase. 1–15.2 indexed citations
10.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2008). Injection of a 100-kW Uplink Signal into the Existing 34-Meter Beam-Waveguide System. 1–14.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2007). Focal-Plane Array Receiver Systems for Space Communications. 1.1 indexed citations
13.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2004). Simultaneous 8- to 9-GHz and 30- to 40-GHz Feed for the Deep Space Network Large Array. 1–16.7 indexed citations
14.
Imbriale, William A., et al.. (2004). The 6-Meter Breadboard Antenna for the Deep Space Network Large Array. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 1–12.3 indexed citations
15.
Epp, L., et al.. (2004). Hard Horn Design for Quasi-Optical Power Combining Using Solid-State Power Amplifiers. 1–21.2 indexed citations
16.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2001). Main-Reflector Manufacturing Technology for the Deep Space Optical Communications Ground Station. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 145. 1.3 indexed citations
17.
Hoppe, Daniel J.. (2001). The Sensitivity of Main-Reflector-Distortion Compensation to Deformable-Mirror Position. 145. 1–13.1 indexed citations
18.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (2001). Development of a 7.2-, 8.4-, and 32-Gigahertz (X-/X-/Ka-Band) Three-Frequency Feed for the Deep Space Network. 145. 1–20.6 indexed citations
19.
Hoppe, Daniel J., et al.. (1988). Conceptual design of a 1-MW CW X-band transmitter for planetary radar. Telecommunications and Data Acquisition Progress Report. 95. 97–111.1 indexed citations
20.
Hoppe, Daniel J.. (1988). Modal analysis applied to circular, rectangular, and coaxial waveguides. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 95. 89–96.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.