Daniel Goldreich

2.1k total citations
30 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Daniel Goldreich is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Goldreich has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Daniel Goldreich's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (18 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers). Daniel Goldreich is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (18 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers). Daniel Goldreich collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Daniel Goldreich's co-authors include Ryan M. Peters, M. C. Wong, Jonathan Tong, Stephen G. Lisberger, Richard J. Krauzlis, Daniel J. Simons, DJ Simons, David M. Claman, Thomas J. Nuckton and Mary A. Peterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Goldreich

30 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Goldreich Canada 18 1.2k 418 200 153 138 30 1.4k
Konstantinos Priftis Italy 27 2.0k 1.7× 354 0.8× 273 1.4× 218 1.4× 138 1.0× 77 3.0k
Paul B. Hibbard United Kingdom 23 1.3k 1.1× 201 0.5× 71 0.4× 156 1.0× 260 1.9× 119 1.5k
Robert W. Van Boven United States 8 817 0.7× 337 0.8× 85 0.4× 82 0.5× 67 0.5× 12 1.1k
Muriel Boucart France 27 1.5k 1.3× 247 0.6× 110 0.6× 105 0.7× 146 1.1× 122 2.0k
Joseph F. X. DeSouza Canada 24 2.3k 1.9× 299 0.7× 175 0.9× 94 0.6× 590 4.3× 62 2.7k
Ari Z. Zivotofsky Israel 23 821 0.7× 141 0.3× 159 0.8× 108 0.7× 185 1.3× 79 1.8k
Rochelle Ackerley Sweden 22 1.2k 1.0× 606 1.4× 108 0.5× 168 1.1× 622 4.5× 56 1.8k
Andrew E. Welchman United Kingdom 27 1.8k 1.6× 379 0.9× 113 0.6× 51 0.3× 283 2.1× 80 2.0k
Alexandre Zénon Belgium 20 1.2k 1.1× 213 0.5× 217 1.1× 30 0.2× 181 1.3× 52 1.7k
Herbert C. Goltz Canada 24 2.1k 1.8× 232 0.6× 133 0.7× 88 0.6× 194 1.4× 70 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Goldreich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Goldreich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Goldreich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Goldreich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Goldreich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Goldreich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Goldreich. The network helps show where Daniel Goldreich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Goldreich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Goldreich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Goldreich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Goldreich. Daniel Goldreich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goldreich, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Exploring Reference Frame Integration Using Response Demands in a Tactile Temporal-Order Judgement Task. Multisensory Research. 34(8). 807–838. 1 indexed citations
2.
Goldreich, Daniel, et al.. (2019). Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 13. 443–443. 13 indexed citations
3.
Goldreich, Daniel, et al.. (2017). An Adaptation-Induced Repulsion Illusion in Tactile Spatial Perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 11. 331–331. 7 indexed citations
4.
Peters, Ryan M., Phillip Staibano, & Daniel Goldreich. (2015). Tactile orientation perception: an ideal observer analysis of human psychophysical performance in relation to macaque area 3b receptive fields. Journal of Neurophysiology. 114(6). 3076–3096. 11 indexed citations
5.
Peters, Ryan M. & Daniel Goldreich. (2013). Tactile Spatial Acuity in Childhood: Effects of Age and Fingertip Size. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e84650–e84650. 23 indexed citations
6.
Wong, M. C., Ryan M. Peters, & Daniel Goldreich. (2013). A Physical Constraint on Perceptual Learning: Tactile Spatial Acuity Improves with Training to a Limit Set by Finger Size. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(22). 9345–9352. 36 indexed citations
7.
Goldreich, Daniel & Jonathan Tong. (2013). Prediction, Postdiction, and Perceptual Length Contraction: A Bayesian Low-Speed Prior Captures the Cutaneous Rabbit and Related Illusions. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 221–221. 39 indexed citations
8.
Goldreich, Daniel & Mary A. Peterson. (2012). A Bayesian Observer Replicates Convexity Context Effects in Figure–Ground Perception. PubMed. 25(3-4). 365–395. 19 indexed citations
9.
Wong, M. C., et al.. (2011). Short-Term Visual Deprivation Does Not Enhance Passive Tactile Spatial Acuity. PLoS ONE. 6(9). e25277–e25277. 26 indexed citations
10.
Wong, M. C., et al.. (2011). Tactile Spatial Acuity Enhancement in Blindness: Evidence for Experience-Dependent Mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience. 31(19). 7028–7037. 126 indexed citations
11.
Goldreich, Daniel, et al.. (2010). Vibrotactile Masking Experiments Reveal Accelerated Somatosensory Processing in Congenitally Blind Braille Readers. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(43). 14288–14298. 35 indexed citations
12.
Goldreich, Daniel, et al.. (2009). A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS). Journal of Visualized Experiments. 17 indexed citations
13.
Peters, Ryan M., et al.. (2009). Diminutive Digits Discern Delicate Details: Fingertip Size and the Sex Difference in Tactile Spatial Acuity. Journal of Neuroscience. 29(50). 15756–15761. 143 indexed citations
14.
Goldreich, Daniel. (2007). A Bayesian Perceptual Model Replicates the Cutaneous Rabbit and Other Tactile Spatiotemporal Illusions. PLoS ONE. 2(3). e333–e333. 89 indexed citations
15.
Goldreich, Daniel, et al.. (2006). Performance of blind and sighted humans on a tactile grating detection task. Perception & Psychophysics. 68(8). 1363–1371. 78 indexed citations
16.
Goldreich, Daniel. (2004). Teaching Undergraduate Neuroscience with Brain Teaser Experiments. Occupational Therapy In Health Care. 18(1-2). 49–55. 1 indexed citations
17.
Goldreich, Daniel, et al.. (2002). Texture discrimination and unit recordings in the rat whisker/barrel system. Physiology & Behavior. 77(4-5). 671–675. 59 indexed citations
18.
Nuckton, Thomas J., et al.. (2000). Hypothermia and afterdrop following open water swimming: The Alcatraz/San Francisco swim study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 18(6). 703–707. 43 indexed citations
19.
Goldreich, Daniel. (1998). Optical imaging and electrophysiology of rat barrel cortex. II. Responses to paired-vibrissa deflections. Cerebral Cortex. 8(2). 184–192. 29 indexed citations
20.
Peterson, B. & Daniel Goldreich. (1994). A new approach to optical imaging applied to rat barrel cortex. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 54(1). 39–47. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026