Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Optical-field-induced current in dielectrics
2012519 citationsAgustin Schiffrin, Tim Paasch‐Colberg et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gerster
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gerster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gerster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gerster more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gerster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gerster. The network helps show where Daniel Gerster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Gerster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Gerster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Gerster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Gerster. Daniel Gerster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gerster, Daniel & Christian Dremel. (2019). AGILE CONTRACTS: LEARNINGS FROM AN AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SOURCING PROJECT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Gerster, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Scaling Agility: How enterprises adopt agile forms of organizational design. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
9.
Gerster, Daniel, et al.. (2018). "Agile Meets Non-Agile": Implications of Adopting Agile Practices at Enterprises. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.9 indexed citations
10.
Gerster, Daniel. (2017). Digital Transformation and IT: Current State of Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 133.19 indexed citations
11.
Gerster, Daniel. (2017). Pax Christi : Eine katholische Friedensgruppe zwischen transnationaler Verflechtung und nationaler Eigendynamik. URN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library).1 indexed citations
12.
Paasch‐Colberg, Tim, Agustin Schiffrin, Nicholas Karpowicz, et al.. (2014). Solid-state light-phase detector. Nature Photonics. 8(3). 214–218.57 indexed citations
Paasch‐Colberg, Tim, Agustin Schiffrin, Nicholas Karpowicz, et al.. (2013). Optical-field-induced current in dielectrics. The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong). 493. QTh4D.5–QTh4D.5.12 indexed citations
15.
Gerster, Daniel. (2012). Friedensdialoge im Kalten Krieg : Eine Geschichte der Katholiken in der Bundesrepublik 1957-1983. Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute).3 indexed citations
16.
Schiffrin, Agustin, Tim Paasch‐Colberg, Nicholas Karpowicz, et al.. (2012). Optical-field-induced current in dielectrics. Nature. 493(7430). 70–74.519 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.