Daniel G. Mead

77 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniel G. Mead
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Infectious Diseases 825
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 291
  • Parasitology 157
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 588
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 385
Replace Elsa Jourdain with:
Elsa Jourdain France
Núria Busquets Spain
Mutien‐Marie Garigliany Belgium
René Bødker Denmark
Angela M. Bosco‐Lauth United States
Andrew B. Allison United States
Gian Luca Autorino Italy
Jeroen Kortekaas Netherlands
Vittorio Gubertì Italy
Simone Peletto Italy
Daniel G. Mead relative to Elsa Jourdain France Elsa Jourdain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Elsa Jourdain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Mead. The network helps show where Daniel G. Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Mead Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Mead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200099
2 200654
3 200248
4 200447
5 199944
6 201043
7 201241
8 200438
9 199736
10 201635
11 201734
12 200534
13 201233
14 200532
15 202229
16 201328
17 201227
18 200726
19 200925
20 201424

About Daniel G. Mead

Daniel G. Mead is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Epidemiology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Vectors (51 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (33 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (27 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (19 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (13 papers), Malaria Research and Control (10 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (8 papers) and Vector-borne infectious diseases (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (825 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (291 citations), Parasitology (157 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (588 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (385 citations). Daniel G. Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include David E. Stallknecht, Elizabeth W. Howerth, C. J. Maré, Andrew B. Allison, Frank B. Ramberg, Mark G. Ruder, Samantha E. J. Gibbs, Uriel Kitron, David G. Besselsen and Rosmarie Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Journal of Medical Entomology, Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene and Emerging infectious diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact