Daniel F. Chamberlain

639 total citations
4 papers, 15 citations indexed

About

Daniel F. Chamberlain is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel F. Chamberlain has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 15 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Daniel F. Chamberlain's work include Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers) and Literary and Cultural Studies (1 paper). Daniel F. Chamberlain is often cited by papers focused on Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers) and Literary and Cultural Studies (1 paper). Daniel F. Chamberlain collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Daniel F. Chamberlain's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Neohelicon, Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos and University of Toronto Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Daniel F. Chamberlain

3 papers receiving 9 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel F. Chamberlain Canada	3	6	6	4	2	2	4	15
Matthew Kaiser United States	3	8 1.3×	8 1.3×	3 0.8×			9	22
Anthony Paul Kerby Canada	3	7 1.2×	3 0.5×	2 0.5×			4	17
Joseph T. Shipley United States	5	8 1.3×	10 1.7×	4 1.0×			11	38
Sir Walter Scott	3	5 0.8×	12 2.0×	2 0.5×			23	26
Nathan Glazer	2	8 1.3×	2 0.3×	3 0.8×	2 1.0×	1 0.5×	2	27
Granville Hicks	3	4 0.7×	7 1.2×	2 0.5×			10	19
Caroline Bowden United Kingdom	5	4 0.7×	3 0.5×	2 0.5×			14	46
Carl Barus United States	3	5 0.8×	2 0.3×	4 1.0×			9	22
Wolfgang Haubrichs Germany	4	5 0.8×	7 1.2×	1 0.3×			24	35
Walter Fähnders Germany	3	5 0.8×	8 1.3×				17	23

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel F. Chamberlain

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel F. Chamberlain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel F. Chamberlain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel F. Chamberlain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel F. Chamberlain

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel F. Chamberlain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel F. Chamberlain. The network helps show where Daniel F. Chamberlain may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

4 of 4 papers shown

1.

Chamberlain, Daniel F.. (2003). The Mexican Corrido and Identity in Regional, National, and International Contexts. Neohelicon. 30(1). 77–87. 3 indexed citations

2.

Chamberlain, Daniel F.. (2001). The "corrido" as Distinction and Mediation. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos. 26(1). 289–298. 1 indexed citations

3.

Chamberlain, Daniel F.. (1990). Narrative Perspective in Fiction: A Phenomenological Meditation of Reader, Text, and World. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 7 indexed citations

4.

Chamberlain, Daniel F.. (1990). Narrative Perspective in Fiction. University of Toronto Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact