Daniel Egle

5.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
88 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Daniel Egle is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Egle has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Oncology, 33 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 29 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Daniel Egle's work include Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (24 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (24 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (22 papers). Daniel Egle is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (24 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (24 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (22 papers). Daniel Egle collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Daniel Egle's co-authors include Christian Marth, Heidi Fiegl, Martin Widschwendter, Ian Jacobs, Joanne Young, Gilbert Spizzo, Daniel J. Weisenberger, Peter W. Laird, Mihaela Campan and Elisabeth Mueller‐Holzner and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Genetics, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Egle

83 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 2022 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Egle Austria 18 1.0k 990 613 397 211 88 2.3k
Christian Schem Germany 24 913 0.9× 790 0.8× 839 1.4× 402 1.0× 167 0.8× 124 2.2k
Nilsa C. Ramirez United States 20 899 0.9× 802 0.8× 615 1.0× 200 0.5× 469 2.2× 45 2.4k
Gro Wiedswang Norway 20 1.1k 1.1× 374 0.4× 763 1.2× 338 0.9× 82 0.4× 38 1.7k
Fan Jin United States 23 1.2k 1.2× 657 0.7× 334 0.5× 518 1.3× 122 0.6× 75 2.2k
Veli‐Matti Kosma Finland 19 711 0.7× 675 0.7× 283 0.5× 280 0.7× 115 0.5× 49 1.9k
Marta A. Crispens United States 25 498 0.5× 568 0.6× 296 0.5× 185 0.5× 163 0.8× 62 1.8k
Marcella Baldewijns Belgium 20 301 0.3× 858 0.9× 389 0.6× 622 1.6× 88 0.4× 62 1.6k
Kyle C. Strickland United States 20 957 1.0× 485 0.5× 343 0.6× 225 0.6× 264 1.3× 72 2.2k
Fabian Trillsch Germany 25 577 0.6× 802 0.8× 568 0.9× 187 0.5× 132 0.6× 128 2.1k
Véronique D’Hondt France 21 781 0.8× 298 0.3× 241 0.4× 335 0.8× 88 0.4× 83 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Egle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Egle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Egle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Egle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Egle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Egle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Egle. The network helps show where Daniel Egle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Egle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Egle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Egle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Egle. Daniel Egle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Wimmer, Kerstin, Dominik Hlauschek, Marija Balić, et al.. (2024). Is the CTS5 a helpful decision-making tool in the extended adjuvant therapy setting?. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 205(2). 227–239. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lackner, Michaela, Débora C. Coraça‐Huber, Klaus Faserl, et al.. (2024). Surface Topography, Microbial Adhesion, and Immune Responses in Silicone Mammary Implant-Associated Capsular Fibrosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 25(6). 3163–3163. 3 indexed citations
4.
Egle, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Shear-Wave Elastography Gradient Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Breast Tumours: A Critical Analysis. Diagnostics. 14(15). 1657–1657. 1 indexed citations
5.
Guarneri, Valentina, François P. Duhoux, Daniel Egle, et al.. (2024). Study design for DESTINY-Breast Respond HER2-low Europe: T-DXd in patients with HER2-low advanced breast cancer. Future Oncology. 20(18). 1237–1250. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bartsch, Rupert, Anna S. Berghoff, Julia Furtner, et al.. (2024). 187P Stage I results of a phase II study of datopotamab deruxtecan (DATO-DXd) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (pts) with active brain metastases (TUXEDO-2). ESMO Open. 9. 103209–103209. 4 indexed citations
9.
Daniaux, Martin, Leonhard Gruber, Tobias De Zordo, et al.. (2023). Preoperative staging by multimodal imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer: Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography compared to conventional mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. European Journal of Radiology. 163. 110838–110838. 13 indexed citations
11.
Morandi, Evi M., et al.. (2023). Long-Term Results after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP versus PAP Flaps Based on Quality of Life and Aesthetic Outcome Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(3). 737–737. 8 indexed citations
12.
Egle, Daniel, et al.. (2023). Is It All about Surface Topography? An Intra-Individual Clinical Outcome Analysis of Two Different Implant Surfaces in Breast Reconstruction. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(4). 1315–1315. 10 indexed citations
13.
Egle, Daniel, Verena Wieser, Afschin Soleiman, et al.. (2023). The Tomosynthesis Broken Halo Sign: Diagnostic Utility for the Classification of Newly Diagnosed Breast Tumors. Tomography. 9(6). 1987–1998.
14.
Gianni, Luca, Chiun‐Sheng Huang, Daniel Egle, et al.. (2022). Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment with or without atezolizumab in triple-negative, early high-risk and locally advanced breast cancer: NeoTRIP Michelangelo randomized study. Annals of Oncology. 33(5). 534–543. 204 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Bartsch, Rupert, Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, et al.. (2022). Updated Austrian treatment algorithm in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. 134(1-2). 63–72. 2 indexed citations
16.
Filipits, Martin, Margaretha Rudas, Christian F. Singer, et al.. (2021). The OncoMasTR Test Predicts Distant Recurrence in Estrogen Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Validation Study in ABCSG Trial 8. Clinical Cancer Research. 27(21). 5931–5938. 1 indexed citations
17.
Bianchini, Giampaolo, Matteo Dugo, Chiun‐Sheng Huang, et al.. (2021). LBA12 Predictive value of gene-expression profiles (GEPs) and their dynamics during therapy in the NeoTRIPaPDL1 trial. Annals of Oncology. 32. S1283–S1284. 15 indexed citations
19.
Singer, Christian F., Yen Y. Tan, Florian Fitzal, et al.. (2017). Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Is Dependent on HER2/CEP17 Ratio in HER2-Amplified Early Breast Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 23(14). 3676–3683. 32 indexed citations
20.
Berger, Regina, Heidi Fiegl, Hans H. Goebel, et al.. (2010). Toll‐like receptor 9 expression in breast and ovarian cancer is associated with poorly differentiated tumors. Cancer Science. 101(4). 1059–1066. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026