Daniel E. Stanton

2.6k total citations
45 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Daniel E. Stanton is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel E. Stanton has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 14 papers in Plant Science and 10 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Daniel E. Stanton's work include Lichen and fungal ecology (19 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (11 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (11 papers). Daniel E. Stanton is often cited by papers focused on Lichen and fungal ecology (19 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (11 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (11 papers). Daniel E. Stanton collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Chile. Daniel E. Stanton's co-authors include Allison K. Shaw, Juan J. Armestó, Marilyn C. Ball, Pieter T. J. Johnson, Lars O. Hedin, Henry S. Horn, Nele Schmitz, Graham D. Farquhar, Hoa Thi Nguyen and Kenneth J. Forshay and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel E. Stanton

44 papers receiving 977 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel E. Stanton United States 17 384 350 285 122 105 45 1.0k
Leslie R. Brown South Africa 17 294 0.8× 260 0.7× 498 1.7× 165 1.4× 65 0.6× 105 1.3k
Lesley G. Campbell United States 19 587 1.5× 730 2.1× 215 0.8× 126 1.0× 348 3.3× 62 1.7k
Koichi Tanaka Japan 20 404 1.1× 299 0.9× 315 1.1× 125 1.0× 269 2.6× 79 1.3k
Jeremiah A. Henning United States 15 243 0.6× 708 2.0× 454 1.6× 99 0.8× 36 0.3× 38 1.4k
Jouko Kumpula Finland 25 283 0.7× 99 0.3× 867 3.0× 144 1.2× 169 1.6× 75 1.6k
Esther Sebastián‐González Spain 25 500 1.3× 186 0.5× 1.2k 4.0× 203 1.7× 131 1.2× 82 1.8k
Ian D. Rotherham United Kingdom 16 173 0.5× 231 0.7× 286 1.0× 375 3.1× 31 0.3× 130 1.2k
Julían Mónge-Nájera Costa Rica 14 419 1.1× 109 0.3× 170 0.6× 38 0.3× 65 0.6× 142 851
Parvin Sultana United Kingdom 20 175 0.5× 184 0.5× 264 0.9× 305 2.5× 111 1.1× 54 1.2k
Bea Maas Austria 18 446 1.2× 180 0.5× 475 1.7× 256 2.1× 73 0.7× 44 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Stanton. The network helps show where Daniel E. Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel E. Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel E. Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel E. Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel E. Stanton. Daniel E. Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coe, Kirsten K., Benjamin E. Carter, Mandy L. Slate, & Daniel E. Stanton. (2024). Moss functional trait ecology: Trends, gaps, and biases in the current literature. American Journal of Botany. 111(2). e16288–e16288. 7 indexed citations
2.
Slate, Mandy L., Anita J. Antoninka, Des A. Callaghan, et al.. (2024). Impact of changing climate on bryophyte contributions to terrestrial water, carbon, and nitrogen cycles. New Phytologist. 242(6). 2411–2429. 20 indexed citations
3.
Koch, Natália Mossmann, et al.. (2024). Symbionts out of sync: Decoupled physiological responses are widespread and ecologically important in lichen associations. Science Advances. 10(24). eado2783–eado2783. 3 indexed citations
4.
Koch, Natália Mossmann, et al.. (2024). Thallus hydrophobicity: A low‐cost method for understanding lichen ecophysiological responses to environmental changes. Applications in Plant Sciences. 12(2). e11565–e11565. 2 indexed citations
5.
Koch, Natália Mossmann, James C. Lendemer, Erin A. Tripp, Christy M. McCain, & Daniel E. Stanton. (2023). Carbon‐concentrating mechanisms are a key trait in lichen ecology and distribution. Ecology. 104(5). e4011–e4011. 7 indexed citations
6.
Stanton, Daniel E., et al.. (2023). Lichen ecophysiology in a changing climate. American Journal of Botany. 110(2). e16131–e16131. 23 indexed citations
7.
McDonald, Tami, et al.. (2022). Climate warming causes photobiont degradation and carbon starvation in a boreal climate sentinel lichen. American Journal of Botany. 110(2). e16114–e16114. 16 indexed citations
9.
Shaw, Allison K., et al.. (2021). Differential retention contributes to racial/ethnic disparity in U.S. academia. PLoS ONE. 16(12). e0259710–e0259710. 13 indexed citations
10.
Stanton, Daniel E., et al.. (2021). Quadrilateral space syndrome induced by a large degenerative osteophyte. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(9). 2593–2600. 1 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Robert J., Sarah Jovan, Daniel E. Stanton, & Susan Will‐Wolf. (2020). Epiphytic macrolichen communities indicate climate and air quality in the U.S. Midwest. The Bryologist. 123(3). 6 indexed citations
12.
Stanton, Daniel E., et al.. (2020). Soil invertebrate diversity loss and functional changes in temperate forest soils replaced by exotic pine plantations. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 7762–7762. 45 indexed citations
13.
Stanton, Daniel E., et al.. (2019). Co-dominant anatomically disparate lichens converge in hydrological functional traits. The Bryologist. 122(3). 463–463. 5 indexed citations
14.
Stanton, Daniel E., et al.. (2016). Morphogeometric Approaches to Non-vascular Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7. 916–916. 12 indexed citations
15.
Rolland, Vivien, Dana M. Bergstrom, Gary Bryant, et al.. (2015). Easy Come, Easy Go: Capillary Forces Enable Rapid Refilling of Embolized Primary Xylem Vessels. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 168(4). 1636–1647. 37 indexed citations
16.
Stanton, Daniel E.. (2015). Small scale fog-gradients change epiphytic lichen shape and distribution. The Bryologist. 118(3). 241–244. 11 indexed citations
17.
Stanton, Daniel E. & Henry S. Horn. (2013). Epiphytes as “filter-drinkers”: life-form changes across a fog gradient. The Bryologist. 116(1). 34–42. 26 indexed citations
18.
Shaw, Allison K. & Daniel E. Stanton. (2012). Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 279(1743). 3736–3741. 122 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Pieter T. J., et al.. (2006). DINING ON DISEASE: HOW INTERACTIONS BETWEEN INFECTION AND ENVIRONMENT AFFECT PREDATION RISK. Ecology. 87(8). 1973–1980. 95 indexed citations
20.
Stanton, Daniel E., et al.. (2000). Realizations of Regular Abstract Polyhedra of Types {3,6} and {6,3}. Discrete & Computational Geometry. 24(2). 241–256. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026