Daniel E. Ingberman

559 total citations
20 papers, 281 citations indexed

About

Daniel E. Ingberman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel E. Ingberman has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 281 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 6 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Daniel E. Ingberman's work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (11 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (5 papers). Daniel E. Ingberman is often cited by papers focused on Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (11 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (5 papers). Daniel E. Ingberman collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel E. Ingberman's co-authors include Dennis A. Yao, James Boyd, Ronald King, Nicholas Dopuch and J. Holloway and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, American Journal of Political Science and Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

In The Last Decade

Daniel E. Ingberman

18 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel E. Ingberman United States	11	196	123	75	33	30	20	281
Peter H. Aranson United States	9	222 1.1×	174 1.4×	40 0.5×	14 0.4×	37 1.2×	19	293
Gerrit De Geest Netherlands	10	203 1.0×	24 0.2×	47 0.6×	29 0.9×	55 1.8×	35	279
Dieter Schmidtchen Germany	9	104 0.5×	139 1.1×	57 0.8×	13 0.4×	41 1.4×	30	248
Christopher R. Drahozal United States	8	119 0.6×	46 0.4×	89 1.2×	36 1.1×	17 0.6×	64	206
Clayton P. Gillette United States	7	97 0.5×	61 0.5×	34 0.5×	25 0.8×	37 1.2×	60	205
Keith L. Dougherty United States	10	142 0.7×	159 1.3×	21 0.3×	12 0.4×	30 1.0×	37	223
Manfred E. Streit Germany	9	114 0.6×	73 0.6×	24 0.3×	23 0.7×	40 1.3×	40	232
Alexander V. Hirsch United States	10	136 0.7×	129 1.0×	75 1.0×	7 0.2×	47 1.6×	20	262
Vivek H. Dehejia Canada	7	170 0.9×	76 0.6×	39 0.5×	61 1.8×	26 0.9×	25	269
Peter Dietsch Canada	8	119 0.6×	105 0.9×	25 0.3×	65 2.0×	48 1.6×	33	269

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Ingberman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Ingberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Ingberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Ingberman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Ingberman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Ingberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Ingberman. The network helps show where Daniel E. Ingberman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel E. Ingberman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel E. Ingberman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel E. Ingberman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel E. Ingberman. Daniel E. Ingberman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Boyd, James & Daniel E. Ingberman. (1999). Do punitive damages promote deterrence?. International Review of Law and Economics. 19(1). 47–68. 16 indexed citations

Holloway, J., Daniel E. Ingberman, & Ronald King. (1999). An analysis of settlement and merit under federal securities law: what will be the effect of the reform of 1995?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 18(1). 1–30. 12 indexed citations

Ingberman, Daniel E. & Ronald King. (1998). Holding Up the 'Deep Pockets'? An Investigation of Auditor's Liability. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Boyd, James & Daniel E. Ingberman. (1997). The Search for Deep Pockets: Is 'Extended Liability' Expensive Liability?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Holloway, J., Ronald King, & Daniel E. Ingberman. (1997). An Analysis of Settlement and Merit Under Federal Securities Law: What Will Be the Effect of the Reform of 1995?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Boyd, James & Daniel E. Ingberman. (1997). The Search for Deep Pockets: Is "Extended Liability" Expensive Liability?. The Journal of Law Economics and Organization. 13(1). 232–258. 28 indexed citations

Dopuch, Nicholas, Daniel E. Ingberman, & Ronald King. (1997). An experimental investigation of multi-defendant bargaining in ‘joint and several’ and proportionate liability regimes. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 23(2). 189–221. 27 indexed citations

Boyd, James & Daniel E. Ingberman. (1997). Should “Relative Safety” be a Test of Product Liability?. The Journal of Legal Studies. 26(2). 433–473. 4 indexed citations

Boyd, James & Daniel E. Ingberman. (1996). The “Polluter Pays Principle”: Should Liability be Extended When the Polluter Cannot Pay?. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice. 21(2). 182–203. 4 indexed citations

10.

Holloway, J., et al.. (1995). Settlement Incentives Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Do the Merits Matter?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

11.

Boyd, James & Daniel E. Ingberman. (1995). Do Punitive Damages Promote Deterrence. SSRN Electronic Journal.

12.

Ingberman, Daniel E.. (1995). Siting Noxious Facilities: Are Markets Efficient?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 29(3). S20–S33. 20 indexed citations

13.

Ingberman, Daniel E.. (1994). Triggers and Priority: An Integrated Model of the Effects of Bankruptcy Law on Overinvestment and Underinvestment. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 72(3). 1341–1377. 2 indexed citations

14.

Ingberman, Daniel E., et al.. (1994). Noncompensatory Damages and Potential Insolvency. The Journal of Legal Studies. 23(2). 895–910. 25 indexed citations

15.

Ingberman, Daniel E., et al.. (1993). An Institutional Theory of Divided Government and Party Polarization. American Journal of Political Science. 37(2). 429–429. 38 indexed citations

16.

Ingberman, Daniel E.. (1992). Incumbent reputations and ideological campaign contributions in spatial competition. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 16(8-9). 147–169. 12 indexed citations

17.

Ingberman, Daniel E. & Dennis A. Yao. (1991). Circumventing formal structure through commitment: Presidential influence and agenda control. Public Choice. 70(2). 151–179. 11 indexed citations

18.

Ingberman, Daniel E. & Dennis A. Yao. (1991). Presidential Commitment and the Veto. American Journal of Political Science. 35(2). 357–357. 44 indexed citations

19.

Ingberman, Daniel E.. (1989). Reputational dynamics in spatial competition. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 12(4-5). 479–496. 10 indexed citations

20.

Ingberman, Daniel E.. (1985). Running against the status quo: Institutions for direct democracy referenda and allocations over time. Public Choice. 46(1). 19–43. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact