Daniel Cromb

591 citations
26 papers · 126 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Cromb

23 papers receiving 125 citations

Peers

Daniel Cromb
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 32
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 11
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 16
  • Epidemiology 26
Replace Ina Rissanen with:
Ina Rissanen Netherlands
Elizabeth A. Mauricio United States
Scott S. Field United States
Ken K. Ong United Kingdom
Shujuan Zeng China
E. Mercuri United Kingdom
Anna C. Tottman New Zealand
Heidi Furre Østgård Norway
J. Daru Hungary
Andrea Stabile Italy
Daniel Cromb relative to Ina Rissanen Netherlands Ina Rissanen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Ina Rissanen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cromb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cromb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cromb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cromb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cromb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cromb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cromb. The network helps show where Daniel Cromb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cromb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cromb Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cromb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201140
2 202317
3 202311
4 20237
5 20237
6 20245
7 20245
8 20244
9 20244
10 20234
11 20163
12 20233
13 20243
14 20242
15 20252
16 20242
17 20241
18 20241
19 20231
20 20251

About Daniel Cromb

Daniel Cromb is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 126 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (32 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (11 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (27 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (16 citations) and Epidemiology (26 citations). Daniel Cromb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mary Rutherford, Serena J. Counsell, Joseph V. Hajnal, Lars‐Olof Wahlund, Iwona Kłoszewska, Magda Tsolaki, Catherine S. Hurt, Hilkka Soininen, Andrew Simmons and Jana Hutter. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of the American Heart Association, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Hypertension.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact