Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America
2014432 citationsRifat Atun, Luiz Odorico Monteiro de Andrade et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cotlear
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cotlear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cotlear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cotlear more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cotlear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cotlear. The network helps show where Daniel Cotlear may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Cotlear
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Cotlear.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Cotlear based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Cotlear. Daniel Cotlear is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cotlear, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Going Universal in Africa. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks.7 indexed citations
Cotlear, Daniel, Octavio Gómez‐Dantés, Felícia Marie Knaul, et al.. (2015). La lucha contra la segregación social en la atención de salud en América Latina. MEDICC Review. 17(1). 40–52.1 indexed citations
6.
Atun, Rifat, Gisele Almeida, Daniel Cotlear, et al.. (2015). La reforma de los sistemas de salud y la cobertura universal de salud en América Latina. MEDICC Review. 17(1). 21–39.5 indexed citations
Atun, Rifat, Luiz Odorico Monteiro de Andrade, Gisele Almeida, et al.. (2014). Health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America. The Lancet. 385(9974). 1230–1247.432 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Cotlear, Daniel, Octavio Gómez‐Dantés, Felícia Marie Knaul, et al.. (2014). Universal health coverage in Latin America 2 Overcoming social segregation in health care in Latin America.8 indexed citations
12.
Cotlear, Daniel. (2011). Population Aging : Is Latin America Ready? [Envejecimiento de la población : ¿está preparada América Latina ?].7 indexed citations
Cotlear, Daniel. (2006). A New Social Contract for Peru: An Agenda for Improving Education, Health Care, and the Social Safety Net. World Bank Publications.13 indexed citations
15.
Cotlear, Daniel. (2006). Un nuevo contrato social para Peru. ¿Como lograr un pais mas educado, saludable y solidario?. 1–463.4 indexed citations
Cotlear, Daniel. (1989). Desarrollo campesino en los Andes : cambio tecnológico y transformación social en las comunidades de la sierra del Perú. Americanae (AECID Library).7 indexed citations
18.
Cotlear, Daniel. (1986). Farmer education and farm efficiency in Peru : the role of schooling, extension services and migration. 1.13 indexed citations
Cotlear, Daniel. (1984). [Urban employment and internal migration in Peru].. PubMed. 7(13). 65–98.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.