Daniel C. Stokes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Raina M. MerchantAnish K. AgarwalSharath Chandra GuntukuLyle UngarGarrick ShermanEmily SeltzerZachary F. MeiselMax Jordan Nguemeni Tiako
- Topics
- Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers)Mental Health via Writing (3 papers)Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsJournal of General Internal Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel C. Stokes
14 papers receiving 240 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 85
- Social Psychology 63
- Clinical Psychology 61
- General Health Professions 50
- Artificial Intelligence 41
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Stokes. The network helps show where Daniel C. Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel C. Stokes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel C. Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel C. Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel C. Stokes. Daniel C. Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | Who is Biking for? Urban Bikeshare Networks' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Disparities in Bikeshare Access, and a Way Forward. | 13 |
| 8 | Understanding Social Support Expressed in a COVID-19 Online Forum | 6 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 88 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 10 |
About Daniel C. Stokes
Daniel C. Stokes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Mental Health via Writing (3 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (23 citations), Health (33 citations) and Family Practice (7 citations). Daniel C. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Raina M. Merchant, Anish K. Agarwal, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Lyle Ungar, Garrick Sherman, Emily Seltzer, Zachary F. Meisel, Max Jordan Nguemeni Tiako, Jonathan Purtle and Alison M. Buttenheim. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Journal of General Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.