Daniel Burns

15 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

Daniel Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Health Informatics 33
  • Health Information Management 20
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 37
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 44
  • Artificial Intelligence 58
Replace R. Gupta with:
R. Gupta United States
Christopher Duckworth United Kingdom
Phillip B. Warner United States
Christopher Bishop United Kingdom
B. Mellado South Africa
C. Campagnari United States
Niki Kilbertus Germany
James Rafferty United Kingdom
Richard Bartels Netherlands
Joseph F. Owens United States
Daniel Burns relative to R. Gupta United States R. Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
R. Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Burns. The network helps show where Daniel Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Burns Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202159
2 201636
3 202323
4 202218
5 202115
6 201915
7 201512
8 202211
9 20245
10 20242
11 20232
12 20182
13 20231
14 20251
15 20221
16
Variable Hold Time in Dynamic Random Access Memories
19910
17 20240
18 20230

About Daniel Burns

Daniel Burns is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Immunology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Machine Learning in Healthcare (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Access Control and Trust (2 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (33 citations), Health Information Management (20 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (37 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (44 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (58 citations). Daniel Burns has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Apostolos Pilaftsis, Michael Boniface, Francis Chmiel, Zlatko Zlatev, T. Daniels, N.M. White, Christopher Duckworth, Ali Roghanian, Ivo Tews and Salah Mansour. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Nuclear Physics B, BMJ Open, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology and Frontiers in Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact