Daniel Bucher

1.1k total citations
9 papers, 833 citations indexed

About

Daniel Bucher is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Bucher has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 833 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Bucher's work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers). Daniel Bucher is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers). Daniel Bucher collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and New Zealand. Daniel Bucher's co-authors include Peter M. Snyder, Diane R. Olson, Erich Buchner, Bertram Gerber, André Fiala, Thomas Hendel, Thomas Riemensperger, Karen Erbguth, Georg Nagel and Christian Schroll and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Bucher

9 papers receiving 814 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Bucher Germany 9 526 344 195 111 97 9 833
Fengqiu Diao United States 16 706 1.3× 359 1.0× 246 1.3× 190 1.7× 94 1.0× 24 972
Pauline Phelan United Kingdom 14 553 1.1× 825 2.4× 163 0.8× 78 0.7× 93 1.0× 18 1.2k
Nathan C. Peabody United States 7 535 1.0× 213 0.6× 217 1.1× 155 1.4× 65 0.7× 7 729
Shin’Ichiro Satake Japan 14 667 1.3× 302 0.9× 175 0.9× 67 0.6× 57 0.6× 20 894
Sibylle Wagner Germany 7 511 1.0× 233 0.7× 254 1.3× 169 1.5× 48 0.5× 14 713
Zhengmei Mao United States 8 749 1.4× 371 1.1× 261 1.3× 157 1.4× 154 1.6× 10 1.1k
Karen L Hibbard United States 7 748 1.4× 313 0.9× 308 1.6× 224 2.0× 92 0.9× 10 922
Sunhoe Bang South Korea 11 582 1.1× 170 0.5× 148 0.8× 78 0.7× 285 2.9× 13 813
Ian J. H. Roberts United Kingdom 13 588 1.1× 546 1.6× 229 1.2× 136 1.2× 66 0.7× 18 1.2k
Jens Rister United States 14 695 1.3× 468 1.4× 179 0.9× 205 1.8× 125 1.3× 22 927

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bucher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bucher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bucher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bucher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bucher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bucher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bucher. The network helps show where Daniel Bucher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Bucher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Bucher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Bucher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Bucher. Daniel Bucher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Tosches, Maria Antonietta, Daniel Bucher, Pavel Vopálenský, & Detlev Arendt. (2014). Melatonin Signaling Controls Circadian Swimming Behavior in Marine Zooplankton. Cell. 159(1). 46–57. 86 indexed citations
2.
Ge, Lihao, Daniel Bucher, Alfio Grillo, et al.. (2014). Synaptic bouton properties are tuned to best fit the prevailing firing pattern. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 8. 101–101. 16 indexed citations
3.
Saumweber, Timo, Stefan Hallermann, Sören Diegelmann, et al.. (2011). Behavioral and Synaptic Plasticity Are Impaired upon Lack of the Synaptic Protein SAP47. Journal of Neuroscience. 31(9). 3508–3518. 19 indexed citations
4.
Nieratschker, Vanessa, Nicole Bock, Daniel Bucher, et al.. (2009). Bruchpilot in Ribbon-Like Axonal Agglomerates, Behavioral Defects, and Early Death in SRPK79D Kinase Mutants of Drosophila. PLoS Genetics. 5(10). e1000700–e1000700. 34 indexed citations
5.
Bucher, Daniel & Erich Buchner. (2008). Stimulating PACα Increases Miniature Excitatory Junction Potential Frequency at theDrosophilaNeuromuscular Junction. Journal of Neurogenetics. 23(1-2). 220–224. 12 indexed citations
6.
Schroll, Christian, Thomas Riemensperger, Daniel Bucher, et al.. (2006). Light-Induced Activation of Distinct Modulatory Neurons Triggers Appetitive or Aversive Learning in Drosophila Larvae. Current Biology. 16(17). 1741–1747. 436 indexed citations
7.
Snyder, Peter M., Diane R. Olson, Fiona J. McDonald, & Daniel Bucher. (2001). Multiple WW Domains, but Not the C2 Domain, Are Required for Inhibition of the Epithelial Na+ Channel by Human Nedd4. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276(30). 28321–28326. 73 indexed citations
8.
Snyder, Peter M., Daniel Bucher, & Diane R. Olson. (2000). Gating Induces a Conformational Change in the Outer Vestibule of Enac. The Journal of General Physiology. 116(6). 781–790. 73 indexed citations
9.
Snyder, Peter M., Diane R. Olson, & Daniel Bucher. (1999). A Pore Segment in DEG/ENaC Na+ Channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 274(40). 28484–28490. 84 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026