Daniel Blanco

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
35 papers, 895 citations indexed

About

Daniel Blanco is a scholar working on Ecology, History and Philosophy of Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Blanco has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 895 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Daniel Blanco's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers). Daniel Blanco is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers). Daniel Blanco collaborates with scholars based in Argentina, United States and Netherlands. Daniel Blanco's co-authors include Szabolcs Nagy, Taej Mundkur, Tatsuya Amano, William J. Sutherland, Tom Langendoen, Brody Sandel, Tamás Székely, Candan U. Soykan, Hannah S. Wauchope and Rafael Antunes Dias and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Climate Change and Solar Energy.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Blanco

34 papers receiving 852 citations

Hit Papers

Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but ma... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Blanco Argentina 13 448 208 169 155 151 35 895
Ryan J. Longman United States 16 183 0.4× 30 0.1× 536 3.2× 122 0.8× 142 0.9× 30 996
J. M. Shawn Hutchinson United States 18 193 0.4× 75 0.4× 392 2.3× 27 0.2× 48 0.3× 37 970
Jelle P. Hilbers Netherlands 12 435 1.0× 50 0.2× 381 2.3× 218 1.4× 198 1.3× 29 1.0k
Attila Lengyel Hungary 17 148 0.3× 28 0.1× 106 0.6× 68 0.4× 276 1.8× 82 932
Sebastian Lehmann Germany 12 360 0.8× 20 0.1× 542 3.2× 100 0.6× 390 2.6× 16 1.1k
Brian S. Cohen United States 13 261 0.6× 17 0.1× 126 0.7× 82 0.5× 83 0.5× 25 570
Paul Holloway Ireland 12 154 0.3× 43 0.2× 78 0.5× 121 0.8× 77 0.5× 50 526
Tetsuji Ota Japan 20 394 0.9× 18 0.1× 457 2.7× 64 0.4× 203 1.3× 83 1.0k
Kai Mäkisara Finland 11 300 0.7× 16 0.1× 529 3.1× 45 0.3× 302 2.0× 22 1.0k
Jasper A.J. Eikelboom Netherlands 6 416 0.9× 36 0.2× 185 1.1× 115 0.7× 142 0.9× 8 870

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Blanco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Blanco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Blanco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Blanco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Blanco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Blanco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Blanco. The network helps show where Daniel Blanco may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Blanco

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Blanco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Blanco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Blanco. Daniel Blanco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blanco, Daniel. (2023). La hermenéutica acomodacionista de Rheticus en defensa de la nueva astronomía. Scientia et Fides. 11(2). 131–147.
2.
Wauchope, Hannah S., Julia P. G. Jones, Jonas Geldmann, et al.. (2022). Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps. Nature. 605(7908). 103–107. 122 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Blanco, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Piezas owenianas en el rompecabezas darwiniano. Asclepio. 72(2). p325–p325. 1 indexed citations
4.
Blanco, Daniel, et al.. (2019). The unifying power of scientific theories. An alternative proposal from structuralism to Kitcher’s explanatory pattern. THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science. 34(1). 111–111. 2 indexed citations
5.
Blanco, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Theoricity, observation and homology: a response to Pearson. History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 40(3). 42–42. 4 indexed citations
6.
Blanco, Daniel, et al.. (2017). Wallace’s and Darwin’s natural selection theories. Synthese. 196(3). 991–1017. 2 indexed citations
7.
Amano, Tatsuya, Tamás Székely, Brody Sandel, et al.. (2017). Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature. 553(7687). 199–202. 166 indexed citations
8.
Carro, Lorena, et al.. (2017). Delftia rhizosphaerae sp. nov. isolated from the rhizosphere of Cistus ladanifer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY. 67(6). 1957–1960. 10 indexed citations
9.
Blanco, S., et al.. (2014). Latin American dose survey results in mammography studies under IAEA programme: radiological protection of patients in medical exposures (TSA3). Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 163(4). 473–479. 11 indexed citations
10.
Blanco, Daniel. (2010). Philosophy of Biology: Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 22(2). 103–108. 6 indexed citations
11.
Blanco, Daniel. (2008). La naturaleza de las adaptaciones en la teología natural británica: análisis historiográfico y consecuencias metateóricas. Ludus vitalis: revista de filosofía de las ciencias de la vida = journal of philosophy of life sciences = revue de philosophie des sciences de la vie. 16(30). 3–26. 3 indexed citations
12.
Roesler, Ignacio, et al.. (2007). BOBOLINK (DOLICHONYX ORYZIVORUS) NUMBERS AND NON BREEDING ECOLOGY IN THE RICE FIELDS OF SAN JAVIER, SANTA FE PROVINCE, ARGENTINA. Ornitología Neotropical. 18(4). 4 indexed citations
13.
Blanco, Daniel, et al.. (2006). Distribution and Abundance of Non-Breeding Shorebirds Along the Coasts of the Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Waterbirds. 29(3). 381–390. 18 indexed citations
14.
Blanco, Daniel, et al.. (2004). Los turbales de la Patagonia: Bases para su inventario y la conservación de su biodiversidad. 20 indexed citations
15.
Ieno, Elena N., Daniela Alemany, Daniel Blanco, & Ricardo Bastida. (2004). Prey Size Selection by Red Knot Feeding on Mud Snails at Punta Rasa (Argentina) During Migration. Waterbirds. 27(4). 493–498. 5 indexed citations
16.
Lanctot, Richard B., Daniel Blanco, Rafael Antunes Dias, et al.. (2002). CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE BUFF-BREASTED SANDPIPER: HISTORIC AND CONTEMPORARY DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE IN SOUTH AMERICA. The Wilson Bulletin. 114(1). 44–72. 38 indexed citations
17.
Davidson, Ian, et al.. (2001). Los humedales de América del Sur : una agenda para la conservación de la biodiversidad y las políticas de desarrollo. 5 indexed citations
18.
Blanco, Daniel. (1998). Uso de hábitat por tres especies de aves playeras (Pluvialis dominica, Limosa haemastica y Calidris fuscicollis) en relación con la marea en Punta Rasa, Argentina. Revista chilena de historia natural. 71(1). 87–94. 9 indexed citations
19.
Blanco, Daniel, Pablo Yorio, & P. Dee Boersma. (1996). Feeding Behavior, Size Asymmetry, and Food Distribution in Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) Chicks. The Auk. 113(2). 496–498. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026