Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bieysse
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bieysse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bieysse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bieysse more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bieysse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bieysse. The network helps show where Daniel Bieysse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Bieysse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Bieysse.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Bieysse based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Bieysse. Daniel Bieysse is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Musoli, Pascal, A. Kangire, Thierry Leroy, et al.. (2009). Towards a variety resistant to coffee wilt disease (CWD): a case for robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) in Uganda.. 1472–1479.4 indexed citations
6.
Bieysse, Daniel, et al.. (2008). Coffee disease risk analysis: How epidemiology knowledge could help in assessing and preventing disease invasion. Agritrop (Cirad). 1422–1423.4 indexed citations
Girma, Atkilt, et al.. (2007). Tracheomycosis (Gibberella xylarioides). A menace to world coffee production : Evidenced by cross inoculation of historical and current strains of the pathogen. Agritrop (Cirad). 1268–1276.4 indexed citations
Musoli, Pascal, et al.. (2005). Control of coffee wilt: study of genetic diversity of Fusarium xylarioides and Coffea canephora in Uganda.. Agritrop (Cirad). 1292–1293.1 indexed citations
13.
Bieysse, Daniel. (2005). INCO : International Scientific Cooperation Projects. Development of a long term strategy based on genetic resistance and agroecological approaches against Coffee Wilt Disease in Africa : third annual report covering period 1/11/2003 to 31/10/2004. Agritrop (Cirad).1 indexed citations
14.
Bieysse, Daniel, et al.. (2002). Coffee berry disease: a potential threat to Arabica coffee growing worldwide.. 144–156.3 indexed citations
15.
Bieysse, Daniel, et al.. (2001). Elaboration d'une stratégie de lutte durable et efficace contre l'anthracnose des baies du caféier Arabica dans les hautes terres de l'ouest-Cameroun : bilan des connaissances acquises et perspectives. Agritrop (Cirad).2 indexed citations
16.
Bieysse, Daniel, et al.. (1998). Observations sur la diversité de la population de Colletotrichum kahawae agent de l'anthracnose des baies du caféier Arabica. Implications pour l'amélioration génétique. Agritrop (Cirad).3 indexed citations
17.
Bieysse, Daniel, et al.. (1995). Diversité génétique et variabilité du pouvoir pathogènee chez Colletotrichum kahawae, agent de l'anthracnose des baies de Coffea arabica. Agritrop (Cirad).1 indexed citations
Fagioli, Sabrina, et al.. (1990). Recherche sur la résistance incomplète à Hemileia vastatrix Berk et Br. dans un groupe de génotypes de Coffea arabica L. d'origine éthiopienne. Café, cacao, thé/Café, cacao, thé. 34(3). 105–144.4 indexed citations
20.
Michaux‐Ferriére, Nicole, et al.. (1989). Etude histologique de l'embryogenèse somatique chez Coffea arabica, induite par culture sur milieux uniques de fragments foliaires de génotypes différents. Agritrop (Cirad). 33(4). 207–217.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.