Daniel Algom

6.1k total citations
127 papers, 4.2k citations indexed

About

Daniel Algom is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Algom has authored 127 papers receiving a total of 4.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 44 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 25 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Daniel Algom's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (35 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (28 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (25 papers). Daniel Algom is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (35 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (28 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (25 papers). Daniel Algom collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Canada. Daniel Algom's co-authors include Eran Chajut, Ainat Pansky, Robert D. Melara, Lawrence E. Marks, Yaacov Trope, Yuval Wolf, Daniel Fitousi, William S. Cain, Elinor Amit and Yaniv Mama and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Algom

123 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Algom Israel 36 2.6k 1.4k 756 565 513 127 4.2k
Richard A. Block United States 33 3.2k 1.2× 1.8k 1.3× 830 1.1× 634 1.1× 421 0.8× 68 4.8k
Juan Lupiáñez Spain 47 6.6k 2.6× 2.5k 1.7× 1.2k 1.5× 739 1.3× 226 0.4× 237 8.1k
Petroc Sumner United Kingdom 33 3.1k 1.2× 866 0.6× 671 0.9× 410 0.7× 104 0.2× 101 4.7k
Jane E. Raymond United Kingdom 40 6.3k 2.5× 1.8k 1.3× 697 0.9× 447 0.8× 136 0.3× 112 7.5k
Ruud Wetzels Netherlands 19 1.4k 0.5× 830 0.6× 544 0.7× 383 0.7× 405 0.8× 33 3.5k
Thomas Rammsayer Germany 41 4.0k 1.5× 2.1k 1.5× 741 1.0× 453 0.8× 537 1.0× 192 5.3k
Jessica Simon United States 29 3.9k 1.5× 1.3k 0.9× 1.2k 1.6× 929 1.6× 230 0.4× 102 5.0k
Sebastiaan Mathôt Netherlands 26 3.1k 1.2× 1.2k 0.8× 828 1.1× 647 1.1× 170 0.3× 75 4.5k
Sylvie Droit‐Volet France 47 5.4k 2.1× 3.4k 2.4× 1.3k 1.7× 825 1.5× 1.3k 2.5× 166 7.0k
Xiaolin Zhou China 39 3.9k 1.5× 1.3k 0.9× 955 1.3× 1.1k 1.9× 110 0.2× 231 5.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Algom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Algom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Algom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Algom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Algom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Algom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Algom. The network helps show where Daniel Algom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Algom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Algom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Algom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Algom. Daniel Algom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Algom, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Age-related differences in processing of emotions in speech disappear with babble noise in the background. Cognition & Emotion. 39(7). 1532–1541. 7 indexed citations
2.
Algom, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Detecting Emotion in Speech: Validating a Remote Assessment Tool. 5(3-4). 238–258. 8 indexed citations
3.
Salti, Moti, et al.. (2019). The many faces of music: Attending to music and delight in the same music are governed by different rules of processing. Acta Psychologica. 200. 102949–102949. 1 indexed citations
4.
Fischer, Martin H., et al.. (2018). On the linear representation of numbers: evidence from a new two-numbers-to-two positions task. Psychological Research. 83(1). 48–63. 5 indexed citations
5.
Ganel, Tzvi, et al.. (2018). The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 2723–2723. 4 indexed citations
6.
Algom, Daniel, et al.. (2017). The Stroop incongruity effect: Congruity relationship reaches beyond the Stroop task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 43(6). 1098–1114. 11 indexed citations
7.
Algom, Daniel, et al.. (2016). Dissociable effects of stimulus range on perception and action. Cortex. 98. 28–33. 9 indexed citations
8.
Tzelgov, Joseph, et al.. (2013). Grasping numbers: evidence for automatic influence of numerical magnitude on grip aperture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 21(3). 830–835. 23 indexed citations
9.
Ben‐David, Boaz M., Eran Chajut, & Daniel Algom. (2012). The Pale Shades of Emotion: A Signal Detection Theory Analysis of the Emotional Stroop Task. Psychology. 3(7). 537–541. 24 indexed citations
10.
Mama, Yaniv, Moshe Shay Ben-Haim, & Daniel Algom. (2012). When emotion does and does not impair performance: A Garner theory of the emotional Stroop effect. Cognition & Emotion. 27(4). 589–602. 15 indexed citations
11.
Karplus, Ilan, et al.. (2010). Film Analysis of the Tactile Communication between Cryptocentrus steinitzi (Pisces, Gobiidae) and Alpheus purpurilenticularis (Crustacea, Alpheidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 49(4). 337–351. 4 indexed citations
12.
Fitousi, Daniel, et al.. (2009). The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics. 71(1). 143–155. 34 indexed citations
13.
Shaki, Samuel, Daniel Algom, & William M. Petrusic. (2006). AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION OF NUMERICAL MAGNITUDE? EVIDENCE FROM JOINT DERIVATION OF SNARC AND SIZE CONGRUITY EFFECTS. 22(1). 275–280. 2 indexed citations
14.
Fitousi, Daniel & Daniel Algom. (2006). TWO-DIGIT NUMBERS: HOW STRONG IS THE GLUE BINDING THEIR DIGITS?. 22(1).
15.
Chajut, Eran & Daniel Algom. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 85(2). 231–248. 270 indexed citations
16.
Pansky, Ainat & Daniel Algom. (2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 28(2). 259–274. 82 indexed citations
17.
Shaki, Samuel & Daniel Algom. (2002). The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: Evidence from the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition. 30(1). 3–17. 20 indexed citations
18.
Algom, Daniel, et al.. (1987). Pain Combines Additively across Different Sensory Systems: A Further Support for the Functional Theory of Pain. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 65(2). 619–625. 8 indexed citations
19.
Rofé, Yacov & Daniel Algom. (1985). Accuracy of Remembering Postdelivery Pain. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 60(1). 99–105. 31 indexed citations
20.
Hoffmann, Jochen, et al.. (1974). Leukocyte Glucocerebrosidase Deficiency Diagnostic in Adult Gaucher's Disease with Negative Bone Marrow Biopsy. Some Properties of the Enzyme in Leukocytes and Spleen. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 4(1). 101–107. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard A. Block Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juan Lupiáñez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Petroc Sumner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jane E. Raymond Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruud Wetzels Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas Rammsayer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jessica Simon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sebastiaan Mathôt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sylvie Droit‐Volet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Xiaolin Zhou
Rankless by CCL
2026