Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Availability in globally distributed storage systems
2010398 citationsDaniel Alexander Ford, Florentina I. Popovici et al.Operating Systems Design and Implementationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Alexander Ford
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Alexander Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Alexander Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Alexander Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Alexander Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Alexander Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Alexander Ford. The network helps show where Daniel Alexander Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Alexander Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Alexander Ford.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Alexander Ford based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Alexander Ford. Daniel Alexander Ford is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Edlund, Stefan, Michal Bromberg, Gabriel Chodick, et al.. (2011). A SpatioTemporal Model for Seasonal Influenza. 6(1). 9.1 indexed citations
2.
Ford, Daniel Alexander, et al.. (2011). Infomax control for acoustic exploration of objects by a mobile robot. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 22–28.11 indexed citations
3.
Seow, W.K., et al.. (2011). Comparison of enamel defects in the primary and permanent dentitions of children from a low-fluoride District in Australia.. PubMed. 33(3). 207–12.53 indexed citations
4.
Ford, Daniel Alexander, Florentina I. Popovici, Murray Stokely, et al.. (2010). Availability in globally distributed storage systems. Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 61–74.398 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Edlund, Stefan, Michal Bromberg, Gabriel Chodick, et al.. (2009). A SpatioTemporal Model for Influenza. 6(1). 160.6 indexed citations
Seow, W.K., et al.. (2008). Common dental conditions associated with dental erosion in schoolchildren in Australia.. PubMed. 29(1). 33–9.81 indexed citations
Ford, Daniel Alexander, et al.. (1999). jCentral: Search the Web for Java. World Conference on WWW and Internet. 1999(1). 626–631.2 indexed citations
12.
Ford, Daniel Alexander. (1992). Performance optimizations for optical disc architectures.1 indexed citations
13.
Ford, Daniel Alexander & Stavros Christodoulakis. (1991). Optimizing Random Retrievals from CLV format Optical Disks. Very Large Data Bases. 413–422.6 indexed citations
Christodoulakis, Stavros, et al.. (1988). Optical Mass Storage Systems and their Performance.. IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin. 11. 14–25.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.