Daniel Abergel

73 papers receiving 993 citations

Peers

Daniel Abergel
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Spectroscopy 685
  • Biophysics 163
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 366
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 219
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 254
Replace Helen Geen with:
Helen Geen United Kingdom
J. R. Quine United States
Kyryl Kobzar Germany
Brandon D. Armstrong United States
David Rovnyak United States
Philippe Pelupessy France
Deniz Sezer Türkiye
A. Baram Israel
Lars T. Kuhn Germany
R. I. Kaiser Canada
Daniel Abergel relative to Helen Geen United Kingdom Helen Geen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Helen Geen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Abergel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Abergel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Abergel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Abergel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Abergel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Abergel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Abergel. The network helps show where Daniel Abergel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Abergel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Abergel Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Abergel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199554
2 200348
3 200838
4 201438
5 200336
6 201035
7 200233
8 201732
9 200430
10 201730
11 202028
12 199227
13 200926
14 200524
15 200422
16 200221
17 201921
18 201919
19 200719
20 200418

About Daniel Abergel

Daniel Abergel is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (51 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (33 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (20 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (19 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (13 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (9 papers) and Electron Spin Resonance Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (685 citations), Biophysics (163 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (366 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (219 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (254 citations). Daniel Abergel has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey Bodenhausen, Arthur G. Palmer, Jean‐Yves Lallemand, Alain Louis‐Joseph, Dennis Kurzbach, Vania Calandrini, Gerald R. Kneller, Paolo Calligari, Piotr Tékély and Luminita Duma. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact