Dandan Tu

640 citations
7 papers · 178 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
    • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Papers in

Dandan Tu

6 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

Dandan Tu
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Health Informatics 17
  • Neurology 56
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 64
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 38
  • Artificial Intelligence 41
Replace Xiaowu Liu with:
Xiaowu Liu China
Antoine Choppin Japan
John Ryu United States
Joshua Lampert United States
Renan Sales Barros Netherlands
Jun Lan China
Mustafa Ahmed Mahmutoglu Germany
Beatriz García Santa Cruz Luxembourg
Sunny Virmani United States
Danielle M. Dargis United States
Dandan Tu relative to Xiaowu Liu China Xiaowu Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Xiaowu Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dandan Tu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dandan Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dandan Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dandan Tu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dandan Tu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dandan Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dandan Tu. The network helps show where Dandan Tu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dandan Tu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dandan Tu Line = papers co-authored together Dandan Tu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 202080
2 202160
3 202323
4 202210
5 20223
6 20242
7 20240

About Dandan Tu

Dandan Tu is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Networks and Communications and Neurology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (1 paper), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (1 paper), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (1 paper), Advanced Neural Network Applications (1 paper) and COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (17 citations), Neurology (56 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (64 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (38 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (41 citations). Dandan Tu has collaborated with scholars based in China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Xiaowu Liu, Changzheng Zhang, Changde Li, Osamah Alwalid, Yongchao Xu, Jia Liu, Xi Long, Lixin Qin, Shi Gong and Qianlan Chen. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Respiration, Radiology, Medical Image Analysis and Respiratory Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact