DanaKai Bradford

950 total citations
38 papers, 660 citations indexed

About

DanaKai Bradford is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, DanaKai Bradford has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 660 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Occupational Therapy, 6 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 6 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in DanaKai Bradford's work include Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (6 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (6 papers) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (6 papers). DanaKai Bradford is often cited by papers focused on Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (6 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (6 papers) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (6 papers). DanaKai Bradford collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. DanaKai Bradford's co-authors include Helen Cooper, Mohan Karunanithi, Yasmin van Kasteren, David Silvera‐Tawil, Thomas H.J. Burne, R Sullivan, Qing Zhang, David Ireland, Brian Key and Yeonsil Moon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

DanaKai Bradford

36 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
DanaKai Bradford Australia 16 192 136 112 90 81 38 660
Cristian Carmeli Switzerland 16 186 1.0× 167 1.2× 89 0.8× 45 0.5× 16 0.2× 46 865
Allitia DiBernardo United States 21 126 0.7× 175 1.3× 87 0.8× 15 0.2× 43 0.5× 45 1.4k
Ofélia P. Carvalho United Kingdom 9 91 0.5× 363 2.7× 38 0.3× 22 0.2× 271 3.3× 9 858
Tricia A. Thornton‐Wells United States 21 74 0.4× 506 3.7× 113 1.0× 35 0.4× 19 0.2× 41 1.1k
Gang Zhang United States 18 390 2.0× 149 1.1× 31 0.3× 32 0.4× 20 0.2× 46 970
Joseph R. Scarpa United States 17 245 1.3× 252 1.9× 141 1.3× 12 0.1× 30 0.4× 29 1.0k
David Margulies United States 15 68 0.4× 370 2.7× 24 0.2× 29 0.3× 26 0.3× 31 1.2k
Sumio Murase Japan 19 655 3.4× 465 3.4× 22 0.2× 36 0.4× 42 0.5× 41 1.6k
Panagiotis Bargiotas Cyprus 19 140 0.7× 360 2.6× 25 0.2× 128 1.4× 19 0.2× 55 1.4k
Eyal Soreq United Kingdom 13 111 0.6× 235 1.7× 59 0.5× 14 0.2× 44 0.5× 45 936

Countries citing papers authored by DanaKai Bradford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of DanaKai Bradford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by DanaKai Bradford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites DanaKai Bradford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by DanaKai Bradford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by DanaKai Bradford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by DanaKai Bradford. The network helps show where DanaKai Bradford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of DanaKai Bradford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of DanaKai Bradford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of DanaKai Bradford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with DanaKai Bradford. DanaKai Bradford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pagnozzi, Alex M., Kerstin Pannek, Roslyn N. Boyd, et al.. (2025). Brain MRI before and at term equivalent age predicts motor and cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants. Neuroimage Reports. 5(2). 100262–100262. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ireland, David, et al.. (2024). A New Role for Chatbots: Automation of a Sleep-Dependent Memory Task. Studies in health technology and informatics. 310. 519–523. 1 indexed citations
4.
Hoffmann, Benjamin D., et al.. (2023). Spread of stinging ants to oceanic islands, and the need to raise awareness of prevention and treatment of ant stings. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 35(4). 560–563. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Pagnozzi, Alex M., Liza van Eijk, Kerstin Pannek, et al.. (2022). Early brain morphometrics from neonatal MRI predict motor and cognitive outcomes at 2-years corrected age in very preterm infants. NeuroImage. 267. 119815–119815. 12 indexed citations
8.
Szollosi, Irene, et al.. (2021). P062 Sleep parameter validation of a home-based ballistocardiograph sleep tracker. SLEEP Advances. 2(Supplement_1). A41–A42. 1 indexed citations
9.
Szollosi, Irene, et al.. (2021). A validation study of a ballistocardiograph sleep tracker against polysomnography. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 18(4). 1203–1210. 10 indexed citations
10.
Silvera‐Tawil, David, et al.. (2021). Enabling Nurse-Patient Communication With a Mobile App: Controlled Pretest-Posttest Study With Nurses and Non–English-Speaking Patients. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(3). e19709–e19709. 7 indexed citations
11.
Saha, Susmita, Alex M. Pagnozzi, Pierrick Bourgeat, et al.. (2020). Predicting motor outcome in preterm infants from very early brain diffusion MRI using a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) model. NeuroImage. 215. 116807–116807. 46 indexed citations
12.
Bradford, DanaKai, et al.. (2019). Understanding the Barriers to Genomic Healthcare in Queensland Through an Information Management Lens. Studies in health technology and informatics. 266. 37–43. 1 indexed citations
13.
Bradford, DanaKai, R Sullivan, Nyoman D. Kurniawan, et al.. (2018). Vitamin D deficiency is associated with reduced hippocampal volume and disrupted structural connectivity in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Human Brain Mapping. 40(2). 394–406. 60 indexed citations
15.
Ireland, David, DanaKai Bradford, & Geremy Farr‐Wharton. (2018). Social Fringe Dwellers: Can chat-bots combat bullies to improve participation for children with autism?. The Journal of Community Informatics. 14(1). 3 indexed citations
16.
Kasteren, Yasmin van, DanaKai Bradford, Qing Zhang, Mohan Karunanithi, & Hang Ding. (2017). Understanding Smart Home Sensor Data for Ageing in Place Through Everyday Household Routines: A Mixed Method Case Study. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 5(6). e52–e52. 19 indexed citations
17.
Groves, Natalie J., DanaKai Bradford, R Sullivan, et al.. (2016). Behavioural Effects of Adult Vitamin D Deficiency in BALB/c Mice Are not Associated with Proliferation or Survival of Neurons in the Adult Hippocampus. PLoS ONE. 11(4). e0152328–e0152328. 19 indexed citations
18.
Bradford, DanaKai, Richard L. M. Faull, Maurice A. Curtis, & Helen Cooper. (2010). Characterization of the Netrin/RGMa receptor neogenin in neurogenic regions of the mouse and human adult forebrain. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 518(16). 3237–3253. 26 indexed citations
19.
Bradford, DanaKai, et al.. (2008). Netrin-1: Diversity in development. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 41(3). 487–493. 96 indexed citations
20.
Kee, Nigel, et al.. (2008). Neogenin and RGMa Control Neural Tube Closure and Neuroepithelial Morphology by Regulating Cell Polarity. Journal of Neuroscience. 28(48). 12643–12653. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026