Dana Schweizer

1.8k total citations
25 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Dana Schweizer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Dana Schweizer has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 15 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Dana Schweizer's work include Renal cell carcinoma treatment (16 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (7 papers) and Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (6 papers). Dana Schweizer is often cited by papers focused on Renal cell carcinoma treatment (16 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (7 papers) and Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (6 papers). Dana Schweizer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Dana Schweizer's co-authors include Inderbir S. Gill, Gyung Tak Sung, MICHAEL G. HOBART, Andrew C. Novick, Anoop Meraney, Eric A. Klein, Stephen J. Savage, Erick M. Remer, Roland N. Chen and Emmanuel L. Bravo and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, The Journal of Urology and Urology.

In The Last Decade

Dana Schweizer

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dana Schweizer United States 14 793 593 371 275 122 25 1.1k
Jon J. Soble United States 16 560 0.7× 584 1.0× 152 0.4× 297 1.1× 59 0.5× 31 1.0k
U. Humke Germany 12 612 0.8× 357 0.6× 344 0.9× 170 0.6× 26 0.2× 46 823
Oktay Akça United States 18 660 0.8× 357 0.6× 271 0.7× 125 0.5× 25 0.2× 61 869
Ronald S. Boris United States 21 719 0.9× 437 0.7× 352 0.9× 66 0.2× 24 0.2× 72 1.1k
Roland N. Chen United States 15 820 1.0× 428 0.7× 307 0.8× 643 2.3× 64 0.5× 24 1.2k
Sidney C. Abreu United States 19 1.1k 1.4× 612 1.0× 452 1.2× 250 0.9× 69 0.6× 38 1.3k
Agnes J. Wang United States 12 929 1.2× 297 0.5× 365 1.0× 200 0.7× 29 0.2× 18 1.0k
Toshiro Honna Japan 20 355 0.4× 727 1.2× 157 0.4× 107 0.4× 62 0.5× 58 1.0k
R C Pfister United States 16 248 0.3× 229 0.4× 73 0.2× 211 0.8× 30 0.2× 30 558
Fatih Atuğ Türkiye 17 665 0.8× 453 0.8× 78 0.2× 289 1.1× 21 0.2× 49 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Schweizer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Schweizer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Schweizer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Schweizer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Schweizer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Schweizer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Schweizer. The network helps show where Dana Schweizer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Schweizer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Schweizer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Schweizer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Schweizer. Dana Schweizer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fergany, Amr, Inderbir S. Gill, Dana Schweizer, et al.. (2002). Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy With Level II Vena Caval Thrombectomy: Survival Porcine Study. The Journal of Urology. 168(6). 2629–2631. 32 indexed citations
2.
Fergany, Amr, Inderbir S. Gill, Dana Schweizer, et al.. (2002). Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy With Level II Vena Caval Thrombectomy: Survival Porcine Study. The Journal of Urology. 2629–2631. 9 indexed citations
3.
Gill, Inderbir S., et al.. (2001). Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: impact on renal function and blood pressure. Urology. 58(3). 357–361. 29 indexed citations
4.
Gill, Inderbir S., Jihad Kaouk, MICHAEL G. HOBART, et al.. (2001). LAPAROSCOPIC BILATERAL SYNCHRONOUS NEPHRECTOMY FOR AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE: THE INITIAL EXPERIENCE. The Journal of Urology. 1093–1098. 4 indexed citations
5.
Gill, Inderbir S., Anoop Meraney, Dana Schweizer, et al.. (2001). Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients. Cancer. 92(7). 1843–1855. 167 indexed citations
6.
Gill, Inderbir S., Andrew C. Novick, Anoop Meraney, et al.. (2000). Laparoscopic renal cryoablation in 32 patients. Urology. 56(5). 748–753. 199 indexed citations
7.
Gill, Inderbir S., Dana Schweizer, MICHAEL G. HOBART, et al.. (2000). RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY:. The Journal of Urology. 1665–1670. 22 indexed citations
8.
Gill, Inderbir S., Dana Schweizer, MICHAEL G. HOBART, et al.. (2000). RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: THE CLEVELAND CLINIC EXPERIENCE. The Journal of Urology. 163(6). 1665–1670. 172 indexed citations
9.
Gill, Inderbir S., Gyung Tak Sung, MICHAEL G. HOBART, et al.. (2000). LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER TRACT TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA: THE CLEVELAND CLINIC EXPERIENCE. The Journal of Urology. 164(5). 1513–1522. 153 indexed citations
10.
Savage, Stephen J., Dana Schweizer, & Inderbir S. Gill. (2000). Reoperative urologic laparoscopy A critical analysis. 1. 71. 1 indexed citations
11.
Gill, Inderbir S., MICHAEL G. HOBART, Dana Schweizer, & Emmanuel L. Bravo. (2000). OUTPATIENT ADRENALECTOMY. The Journal of Urology. 717–717. 5 indexed citations
12.
HSU, THOMAS H.S., Inderbir S. Gill, Dana Schweizer, Matthew D. Dunn, & Ralph V. Clayman. (1999). LAPAROSCOPIC VS. OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY IN THE HIGH-RISK PATIENT (ASA CLASS >or= to 3). The Journal of Urology. 22–22. 1 indexed citations
13.
HSU, THOMAS H.S., Inderbir S. Gill, Surena F. Matin, et al.. (1999). Radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy in the octogenarian and nonagenarian: comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology. 53(6). 1121–1125. 56 indexed citations
14.
Schweizer, Dana, et al.. (1999). FINANCIAL COST ANALYSIS OF LAPAROSCOPIC vs. OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY. The Journal of Urology. 11–11. 4 indexed citations
15.
HOBART, MICHAEL G., Inderbir S. Gill, Dana Schweizer, & E L Bravo. (1999). FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NEEDLESCOPIC VERSUS OPEN ADRENALECTOMY. The Journal of Urology. 1264–1267. 4 indexed citations
16.
Gill, Inderbir S., Dana Schweizer, Michel Gagner, et al.. (1999). LAPAROSCOPIC vs. OPEN ADRENALECTOMY. The Journal of Urology. 21–21. 19 indexed citations
17.
Ng, Christopher, et al.. (1999). RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC SURGERY IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED CARBON DIOXIDE ABSORPTION. The Journal of Urology. 1268–1272. 1 indexed citations
18.
HOBART, MICHAEL G., Inderbir S. Gill, Dana Schweizer, & E L Bravo. (1999). FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NEEDLESCOPIC VERSUS OPEN ADRENALECTOMY. The Journal of Urology. 162(4). 1264–1267. 31 indexed citations
19.
Gill, Inderbir S., MICHAEL G. HOBART, Jon J. Soble, et al.. (1999). RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY. The Journal of Urology. 166–166. 9 indexed citations
20.
Schweizer, Dana, Inderbir S. Gill, Gyung Tak Sung, & Jon J. Soble. (1999). LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY. The Journal of Urology. 93–93. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026