Dana Crowley Jack
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Diana L. DillAlisha AliJudith WittnerKathryn AndersonSusan ArmitageLeslie R. BrodyMardge H. CohenSannisha K. Dale
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dana Crowley Jack
18 papers receiving 698 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Clinical Psychology 346
- Social Psychology 298
- Sociology and Political Science 246
- General Health Professions 153
- Gender Studies 124
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Crowley Jack
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Crowley Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Crowley Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Crowley Jack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Crowley Jack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Crowley Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Crowley Jack. The network helps show where Dana Crowley Jack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Crowley Jack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Crowley Jack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Crowley Jack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Crowley Jack. Dana Crowley Jack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | Researchers List: Publications Relying on the Silencing the Self Scale and Theory | 1 |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | Handbook of Multicultural Psychology | 6 |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 90 | |
| 7 | "I Don't Express My Feelings to Anyone": How Self-Silencing Relates to Gender and Depression in Nepal | 7 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Behind the mask | 6 |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 369 | |
| 15 | Silencing the self | 41 |
| 16 | Silencing the Self. Women and Depression. New York (HarperCollins) 1991. | 0 |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 52 | |
| 19 | Silencing the Self: The Power of Social Imperatives in Female Depression | 13 |
About Dana Crowley Jack
Dana Crowley Jack is a scholar working on General Psychology, Public Administration and Clinical Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (346 citations), Social Psychology (298 citations) and Gender Studies (124 citations). Dana Crowley Jack has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Diana L. Dill, Alisha Ali, Judith Wittner, Kathryn Anderson, Susan Armitage, Leslie R. Brody, Mardge H. Cohen, Sannisha K. Dale, Kathleen M. Weber and Annette L. Fitzpatrick. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Women Quarterly, AIDS and Behavior and AIDS Patient Care and STDs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.