Dag Hoem

2.1k citations
37 papers · 1.6k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 20

Dag Hoem

37 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles ...3592016202620192022100200300

Peers

Dag Hoem
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Oncology 701
  • Surgery 621
  • Cancer Research 178
  • Biomedical Engineering 504
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 300
Replace Takao Matsubara with:
Takao Matsubara Japan
Yoshiaki Kuriu Japan
Yasutoshi Murayama Japan
Jeroen Hagendoorn Netherlands
Quirijn R.J.G. Tummers Netherlands
Hironori Ishigami Japan
Hiroki Ochiai Japan
Leonora S. F. Boogerd Netherlands
Kanji Katayama Japan
Kazuhiko Kasuya Japan
Dag Hoem relative to Takao Matsubara Japan Takao Matsubara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Takao Matsubara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dag Hoem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dag Hoem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dag Hoem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dag Hoem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dag Hoem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dag Hoem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dag Hoem. The network helps show where Dag Hoem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dag Hoem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dag Hoem Line = papers co-authored together Dag Hoem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201812
2 20178
3 201714
4 201726
5 20174
6
A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancerbreakdown →
2016359
7 201542
8 201523
9 201525
10 201328
11 2013184
12 201223
13 201174
14 2008175
15
Epidemiology and risk factors for exocrine pancreatic cancer
20074
16 200678
17 200213
18 200274
19 200217
20 199915

About Dag Hoem

Dag Hoem is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Hepatology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (20 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (11 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (6 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (6 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (6 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (5 papers), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (4 papers) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (701 citations), Surgery (621 citations), Cancer Research (178 citations), Biomedical Engineering (504 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (300 citations). Dag Hoem has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Anders Molven, Georg Dimcevski, Odd Helge Gilja, Heike Immervoll, Michiel Postema, Spiros Kotopoulis, Asgaut Viste, Åke Andrén‐Sandberg, Halfdan Sørbye and Per Øystein Sakariassen. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, Annals of Oncology, Pancreatology, BMC Cancer and Pancreas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026