D. Stott Parker

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
83 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

D. Stott Parker is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Stott Parker has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 25 papers in Ecology and 23 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in D. Stott Parker's work include Marine and fisheries research (25 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (15 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers). D. Stott Parker is often cited by papers focused on Marine and fisheries research (25 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (15 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers). D. Stott Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Australia. D. Stott Parker's co-authors include Ali Dasdan, Hung‐Chih Yang, Robert M. Bilder, Russell A. Poldrack, Fred W. Sabb, Chang-Shing Perng, Houqiao Wang, Paolo Atzeni, Nelson B. Freimer and Donald Kalar and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Trends in Cognitive Sciences and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

D. Stott Parker

75 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

Peers

D. Stott Parker

CNC

IS

AI

SP

CN

Éric Miller United States

Peter J. Bentley United Kingdom

Isabel F. Cruz United States

Marco Saerens Belgium

Ryan A. Rossi United States

Patrick Mäder Germany

Paul E. Utgoff United States

Bartolo Luque Spain

Kensuke Fukuda Japan

E. A. Leicht United States

Éric Miller United States

D. Stott Parker

217 ×0.3

CNC

468 ×1.0

IS

630 ×1.5

AI

105 ×0.3

SP

156 ×0.5

CN

Citations per year, relative to D. Stott Parker D. Stott Parker (= 1×) peers Éric Miller

Countries citing papers authored by D. Stott Parker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Stott Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Stott Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Stott Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Stott Parker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Stott Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Stott Parker. The network helps show where D. Stott Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Stott Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Stott Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Stott Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Stott Parker. D. Stott Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Plagányi, Éva E., et al.. (2025). Towards Implementing Multispecies Harvest Strategies That Are Robust to Interacting Populations. Fish and Fisheries. 26(5). 923–941.

2.

Hartmann, Klaas, et al.. (2025). Estimating moult timing in lobsters: A Bayesian Approach. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

3.

Fraile, Igaratza, Jessica H. Farley, Naomi Clear, et al.. (2024). Otolith stable isotopes highlight the importance of local nursery areas as the origin of recruits to yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) fisheries in the western Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research. 281. 107241–107241. 1 indexed citations

4.

Hartmann, Klaas, et al.. (2024). Appendage damage effects on Southern Rock Lobster growth and mortality. Fisheries Research. 279. 107153–107153.

5.

Adams, Luther, et al.. (2023). Patterns and potential drivers of mesophotic communities of the warm-temperate Amathole shelf of South Africa. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. 295. 108562–108562. 2 indexed citations

6.

Parker, D. Stott, et al.. (2023). Multi-decade catches of manta rays (Mobula alfredi, M. birostris) from South Africa reveal significant decline. Frontiers in Marine Science. 10. 10 indexed citations

7.

Pascoe, Sean, Roy A. Deng, Trevor Hutton, & D. Stott Parker. (2023). Determining the Appropriate Minimum Effort Levels for Use in Fisheries Dynamic Bioeconomic Models. Sustainability. 15(24). 16933–16933.

8.

Wambiji, Nina, BQ Mann, D. Stott Parker, et al.. (2022). Status and challenges for sustainable billfish fisheries in the Western Indian Ocean. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 32(4). 1035–1061. 8 indexed citations

9.

Parker, D. Stott, et al.. (2021). ROV assessment of mesophotic fish and associated habitats across the continental shelf of the Amathole region. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 18171–18171. 10 indexed citations

10.

Samaai, Toufiek, Michelle Kelly, Peter R. Teske, et al.. (2020). New Latrunculiidae (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) from the Agulhas ecoregion of temperate southern Africa. Zootaxa. 4896(3). zootaxa.4896.3.4–zootaxa.4896.3.4. 4 indexed citations

11.

Mlambo, Musa C., et al.. (2020). Protected and un-protected urban wetlands have similar aquatic macroinvertebrate communities: A case study from the Cape Flats Sand Fynbos region of southern Africa. PLoS ONE. 15(5). e0233889–e0233889. 7 indexed citations

12.

Winker, Henning, Felipe Carvalho, James T. Thorson, et al.. (2019). JABBA-Select: Incorporating life history and fisheries’ selectivity into surplus production models. Fisheries Research. 222. 105355–105355. 27 indexed citations

13.

Parker, D. Stott & Anthony J. Booth. (2013). The tongue-replacing isopod Cymothoa borbonica reduces the growth of largespot pompano Trachinotus botla. Marine Biology. 160(11). 2943–2950. 18 indexed citations

14.

Poldrack, Russell A., Aniket Kittur, Donald Kalar, et al.. (2011). The Cognitive Atlas: Toward a Knowledge Foundation for Cognitive Neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 5. 17–17. 245 indexed citations

15.

Toga, Arthur W., Ivo D. Dinov, Paul M. Thompson, et al.. (2011). The Center for Computational Biology: resources, achievements, and challenges. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 19(2). 202–206. 5 indexed citations

16.

Bilder, Robert M., Fred W. Sabb, D. Stott Parker, et al.. (2009). Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. 14(4-5). 419–450. 74 indexed citations

17.

Sabb, Fred W., Carrie E. Bearden, David C. Glahn, et al.. (2008). A collaborative knowledge base for cognitive phenomics. Molecular Psychiatry. 13(4). 350–360. 54 indexed citations

18.

Parker, D. Stott, et al.. (2008). Solving the Problem of Trans-Genomic Query with Alignment Tables. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 5(3). 432–447. 1 indexed citations

19.

Atzeni, Paolo & D. Stott Parker. (1986). Set containment inference and syllogisms. Theoretical Computer Science. 62(1-2). 39–65. 4 indexed citations

20.

Parker, D. Stott, Gerald J. Popek, Alley Stoughton, et al.. (1986). Detection of mutual inconsistency in distributed systems. 306–312. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact