Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Extensive Aortic Replacement using “Elephant Trunk” Prosthesis
1983484 citationsH. Borst, G. Walterbusch et al.The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeonprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Schaps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Schaps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Schaps more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Schaps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Schaps. The network helps show where D. Schaps may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Schaps
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Schaps.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Schaps based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Schaps. D. Schaps is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Seitz, Walter, et al.. (1991). [Propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia during heart surgery. Results of pharmacological studies in man].. PubMed. 40(3). 145–52.10 indexed citations
Hetzer, Roland, S. Schüler, H. Warnecke, et al.. (1985). [Heart transplantation in cardiomyopathy].. PubMed. 10(3). 149–56.2 indexed citations
7.
Schaps, D., et al.. (1984). [Therapeutic use of amezinium methylsulfate--a new, long acting, sympathomimetic--in paraspinal conduction anesthesia].. PubMed. 19(5). 235–9.1 indexed citations
8.
Schaps, D., et al.. (1984). [Roentgen contrast medium representation, a possibility for controlling catheter placement in continuous brachial plexus anesthesia].. PubMed. 7(3). 96–7.1 indexed citations
9.
Borst, H., G. Walterbusch, & D. Schaps. (1983). Extensive Aortic Replacement using “Elephant Trunk” Prosthesis. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 31(1). 37–40.484 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Hempelmann, G., et al.. (1982). [Haemodynamic effects of fentanyl in man during cardiac surgery (author's transl)].. PubMed. 31(3). 103–10.1 indexed citations
11.
Seitz, Walter, et al.. (1982). [Endocrine reaction pattern in the course of a one-phase tramadol-N2O combination anesthesia].. PubMed. 17(6). 325–31.2 indexed citations
Piepenbrock, S, et al.. (1980). [Cardiovascular effects of dopamine during neuroleptanaesthesia (author's transl)].. PubMed. 15(6). 460–9.1 indexed citations
15.
Schaps, D., G. Hempelmann, & R. Pichlmayr. (1978). [Orthotopic liver transplantation in man from the anaesthesiological point of view (author's transl)].. PubMed. 27(9). 405–15.1 indexed citations
Barthels, M., et al.. (1977). [Early changes of the coagulation system in multiple injuries and their modification with heparin and Trasylol].. PubMed. 119–23.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.