Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The abundances of constituents of Titan's atmosphere from the GCMS instrument on the Huygens probe
2005694 citationsH. Niemann, S. K. Atreya et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. N. Harpold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. N. Harpold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. N. Harpold more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. N. Harpold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. N. Harpold. The network helps show where D. N. Harpold may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. N. Harpold
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. N. Harpold.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. N. Harpold based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. N. Harpold. D. N. Harpold is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Webster, C. R., S. K. Atreya, H. B. Franz, et al.. (2013). Abundance and Isotopic Composition of Gases in the Martian Atmosphere: First Results from the Mars Curiosity Rover. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
3.
Mahaffy, P. R., R. R. Hodges, D. N. Harpold, et al.. (2012). Calibration of the Neutral Mass Spectrometer for the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Mission. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2144.1 indexed citations
Mahaffy, P. R., R. R. Hodges, M. Benna, et al.. (2009). Neutral Mass Spectrometer Under Development for the Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Mission. LPI. 1217.2 indexed citations
7.
Niemann, H., S. K. Atreya, J. Haberman, et al.. (2006). In Situ Measurements of the Composition of Titan's Atmosphere. 36. 2554.1 indexed citations
Niemann, H., J. Demick, J. Haberman, et al.. (2005). Cassini-Huygens Probe Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) Experiment -- First Results. 36th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1663.2 indexed citations
10.
Niemann, H., S. K. Atreya, S. J. Bauer, et al.. (2005). The abundances of constituents of Titan's atmosphere from the GCMS instrument on the Huygens probe. Nature. 438(7069). 779–784.694 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Niemann, H., J. Demick, J. Haberman, et al.. (2005). The Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) Experiment on the Cassini-Huygens Probe: First Results. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
Harpold, D. N. & C. A. Reber. (1968). A mass spectrometric technique for measurement of atomic oxygen in the earth's upper atmosphere. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.