Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
GALACTIC MAGNETISM: Recent Developments and Perspectives
1996606 citationsR. Beck, Axel Brandenburg et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Moss more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Moss. The network helps show where D. Moss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Moss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Moss.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Moss based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Moss. D. Moss is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Katsova, M. M., L. L. Kitchatinov, M. A. Livshits, et al.. (2018). Can superflares occur on the Sun?:a view from dynamo theory. University of Oulu Repository (University of Oulu).15 indexed citations
Moss, D.. (2001). Magnetic Fields in the Ap and Bp Stars: a Theoretical Overview. ASPC. 248. 305.6 indexed citations
13.
Covas, Eurico, Reza Tavakol, & D. Moss. (2000). Spatiotemporal fragmentation as a mechanism { } for different dynamical modes of behaviour { } in the solar convection zone. CERN Bulletin. 363.3 indexed citations
14.
Moss, D.. (1996). Magnetic fields in the Milky Way and other spiral galaxies. Observatory. 116. 142–144.2 indexed citations
15.
Tuominen, I., D. Moss, F. Krause, et al.. (1991). IAC volume 130 Cover and Front Matter. International Astronomical Union Colloquium. 130. f1–f9.1 indexed citations
16.
Tuominen, I., D. Moss, & Günther Rüdiger. (1991). The sun and cool stars : activity, magnetism, dynamos : proceedings of Colloquium No. 130 of the International Astronomical Union, held in Helsinki, Finland, 17-20 July 1990. Springer eBooks.4 indexed citations
17.
Moss, D., Axel Brandenburg, & I. Tuominen. (1991). Properties of mean field dynamos with non-axisymmetric alpha-effect. A&A. 247(2). 576–579.3 indexed citations
18.
Moss, D., L. Mestel, & R. J. Tayler. (1990). The rotation of early-type magnetic stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 245(3). 550–558.10 indexed citations
19.
Moss, D.. (1990). Time-dependent models for magnetic CP stars. V - The oblique rotator. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 244(2). 272–280.9 indexed citations
20.
Brandenburg, Axel, F. Krause, Reinhard Meinel, D. Moss, & I. Tuominen. (1989). The stability of nonlinear dynamos and the limited role of kinematic growth rates. A&A. 213. 411–422.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.