This map shows the geographic impact of D. Mohanraj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Mohanraj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Mohanraj more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Mohanraj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Mohanraj. The network helps show where D. Mohanraj may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Mohanraj
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Mohanraj.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Mohanraj based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Mohanraj. D. Mohanraj is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nagarajan, R., et al.. (2010). A Study on Genetics of Red Rot Resistance in Sugarcane. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(4). 656–659.5 indexed citations
3.
Mohanraj, D., et al.. (2004). Purification and partial characterization of a phytotoxin produced by Colletotrichum falcatum. Indian Phytopathology. 57(1). 65–67.1 indexed citations
Viswanathan, R., et al.. (2002). Occurrence of yellow leaf, syndrome of sugarcane in India. Indian Phytopathology. 55(3). 351–354.1 indexed citations
6.
Mohanraj, D., S. Kumaresan, & T. V. Sreenivasan. (2002). Molecular characterisation of isolates of the sugarcane red rot pathogen. Indian Phytopathology. 55(2). 147–151.7 indexed citations
7.
Mohanraj, D., et al.. (2001). Standardization of an indirect ELISA technique for detection of Ustilago scitaminea Syd., causal agent of sugarcane smut disease. JOURNAL OF MYCOLOGY AND PLANT PATHOLOGY.2 indexed citations
8.
Viswanathan, R., et al.. (2000). Indirect-ELISA technique for the detection of the red rot pathogen in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) and resistance screening.. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 70(5). 308–311.6 indexed citations
9.
Viswanathan, R., et al.. (2000). Role of Sphacelotheca sorghii (Link.) Clinton adapted to Ischaemum ciliare and Saccharum spp in secondary infection of sugar cane smut.. Tropical Agriculture. 77(2). 83–88.1 indexed citations
10.
Viswanathan, R., et al.. (2000). Possible involvement of anthocyanin compounds in resistance of sugarcane against red rot. Indian Phytopathology. 53(3). 311–313.9 indexed citations
11.
Viswanathan, R., et al.. (1998). IMMUNOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETECTION OF LEAF SCALD DISEASE OF SUGARCANE. Indian Phytopathology. 51(2). 187–189.1 indexed citations
Viswanathan, R., et al.. (1997). Growing virulence of red rot pathogen of sugarcane in Tamil Nadu. 47(1). 23–30.15 indexed citations
14.
Viswanathan, R., et al.. (1996). Accumulation of 3-deoxyanthocyanidin phytoalexins luteolinidin and apigeninidin in sugarcane in relation to red rot disease. Indian Phytopathology. 49(2). 174–175.7 indexed citations
Subramanian, Nithya, et al.. (1976). Efficacy of fungicides in the control of foliar diseases of sorghum.. Madras Agricultural Journal. 63. 413–414.1 indexed citations
20.
Mohanraj, D., et al.. (1972). Possible role of sugars in the anthracnose disease resistance mechanisms in grapevine varieties.. Indian Phytopathology. 25(1). 138–139.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.