D. M. Asner

69.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

D. M. Asner is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, D. M. Asner has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in D. M. Asner's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (10 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (5 papers). D. M. Asner is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (10 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (5 papers). D. M. Asner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. D. M. Asner's co-authors include J. H. Rademacker, John F. Gunion, W. Sun, B. Nemati, R. Stroynowski, J. Dominick, G. Wilkinson, S. Ricciardi, A. Powell and T. Gershon and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Journal of High Energy Physics and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

D. M. Asner

18 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Review of Multibody Charm Analyses 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. M. Asner United States 6 1.8k 316 140 49 43 19 1.9k
J. H. Rademacker United Kingdom 9 1.8k 1.0× 309 1.0× 152 1.1× 65 1.3× 45 1.0× 20 1.9k
D. Schildknecht Germany 26 1.8k 1.0× 249 0.8× 158 1.1× 28 0.6× 34 0.8× 105 1.8k
É. A. Kuraev Russia 20 2.6k 1.5× 173 0.5× 190 1.4× 60 1.2× 35 0.8× 188 2.8k
E. A. Paschos Germany 29 3.3k 1.9× 401 1.3× 137 1.0× 22 0.4× 44 1.0× 123 3.4k
A. Barroso Portugal 22 1000 0.6× 250 0.8× 193 1.4× 51 1.0× 27 0.6× 59 1.1k
F. M. Renard France 22 1.5k 0.8× 178 0.6× 156 1.1× 71 1.4× 31 0.7× 129 1.6k
Fulvia De Fazio Italy 32 2.7k 1.5× 197 0.6× 85 0.6× 14 0.3× 33 0.8× 114 2.7k
E. D. Bloom United States 17 1.6k 0.9× 226 0.7× 173 1.2× 84 1.7× 15 0.3× 55 1.8k
A. I. Sanda United States 26 3.2k 1.8× 167 0.5× 188 1.3× 29 0.6× 64 1.5× 86 3.3k
Francesco Vissani Italy 33 3.4k 1.9× 683 2.2× 66 0.5× 50 1.0× 17 0.4× 106 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by D. M. Asner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. M. Asner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. M. Asner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. M. Asner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. M. Asner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. M. Asner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. M. Asner. The network helps show where D. M. Asner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. M. Asner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. M. Asner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. M. Asner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. M. Asner. D. M. Asner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Simos, N., G. Atoian, A. E. Bolotnikov, et al.. (2020). Radiation damage from energetic particles at GRad-level of SiO2 fibers of the Large Hadron Collider ATLAS Zero-Degree Calorimeter (ZDC). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 980. 164444–164444. 1 indexed citations
3.
Asner, D. M. & J. H. Rademacker. (2016). Review of Multibody Charm Analyses. Explore Bristol Research. 1770 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Gates, Richard S., et al.. (2015). How to Produce a Reactor Neutron Spectrum Using a Proton Accelerator. Physics Procedia. 66. 471–480. 2 indexed citations
5.
Hartung, W., D. M. Asner, Joseph Conway, et al.. (2015). In-situ measurements of the secondary electron yield in an accelerator environment: Instrumentation and methods. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 783. 95–109. 10 indexed citations
6.
Libby, J., S. Malde, A. Powell, et al.. (2014). New determination of the D0Kπ+π0 and D0Kπ+π+π coherence factors and average strong-phase differences. Physics Letters B. 731. 197–203. 10 indexed citations
7.
Metreveli, Z., S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, et al.. (2012). Phase difference between the electromagnetic and strong amplitudes forψ(2S)andJ/ψdecays into pairs of pseudoscalar mesons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(9). 3 indexed citations
8.
Asner, D. M., et al.. (2011). IN SITU SECONDARY ELECTRON YIELD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AT CesrTA. 3 indexed citations
9.
Asner, D. M.. (2009). Inclusive semileptonic decays of charm and charmed-strange mesons. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
10.
Bigi, I. I., H. B. Li, & D. M. Asner. (2009). Chapter 25 $D^0 - \overline D^0 $ Mixing. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 24(supp01). 627–656. 2 indexed citations
11.
Asner, D. M.. (2006). Time-Independent Measurements of D0-D0 Mixing and Relative Strong Phases Using Quantum Correlations at CLEO-c. AIP conference proceedings. 814. 421–425. 1 indexed citations
12.
Asner, D. M. & W. Sun. (2006). Time-independent measurements ofD0D¯0mixing and relative strong phases using quantum correlations. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 73(3). 23 indexed citations
13.
Asner, D. M.. (2006). $D^0 \bar{D}^0$ Quantum Correlations, Mixing, and Strong Phases. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 21(27). 5456–5459. 6 indexed citations
14.
Asner, D. M.. (2006). On the Case for a Super Tau-Charm Factory. ArXiv.org. 41. 377–392. 4 indexed citations
15.
Asner, D. M.. (2003). Studying Standard Model-Like Higgs Bosons in Two-Photon Collisions at a Linear Collider. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 18(16). 2817–2826. 1 indexed citations
16.
Asner, D. M., et al.. (2003). Detecting and studying Higgs bosons at a photon-photon collider. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(3). 36 indexed citations
17.
Asner, D. M., et al.. (2001). Detecting and Studying Higgs Bosons in Two-Photon Collisions at a Linear Collider. CERN Bulletin. 4 indexed citations
18.
Asner, D. M.. (1999). Hadronic structure in the decay tau- ---> tau-neutrino pi- pi0pi0 and the sign of the tau-neutrino helicity. Physical Review.
19.
Asner, D. M., F. Butler, J. Dominick, et al.. (1996). Experimental study of aerogel Cherenkov detectors for particle identification. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 374(3). 286–292. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026