D J Coster

451 total citations
13 papers, 235 citations indexed

About

D J Coster is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, D J Coster has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 235 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 4 papers in Ophthalmology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in D J Coster's work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers). D J Coster is often cited by papers focused on Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers). D J Coster collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. D J Coster's co-authors include Keryn A. Williams, Scott Standfield, Helen M. Brereton, Justine R. Smith, Prue H. Hart, Christopher R. Parish, Sonja Klebe, Kathleen A. McClellan, D L Easty and Marie Therese Lowe and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Transplantation and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

D J Coster

13 papers receiving 219 citations

Peers

D J Coster
Eva-Marie Chong United States
Behrad Y. Milani United States
Heidi Wat Canada
Stephen J. Tuft United Kingdom
Lien Tat Australia
Monika Pradhan New Zealand
Gargi K. Vora United States
Vijay Savant United Kingdom
Eva-Marie Chong United States
D J Coster
Citations per year, relative to D J Coster D J Coster (= 1×) peers Eva-Marie Chong

Countries citing papers authored by D J Coster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D J Coster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D J Coster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D J Coster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D J Coster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D J Coster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D J Coster. The network helps show where D J Coster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D J Coster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D J Coster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D J Coster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D J Coster. D J Coster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Chen, Celia S., Andrew W. Lee, Bruce Campbell, et al.. (2011). Study of the Efficacy of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion. International Journal of Stroke. 6(1). 87–89. 9 indexed citations
2.
Klebe, Sonja, et al.. (2011). 18. Altered expression of aquaporins in corneal endothelium in diseased states. Pathology. 43. S94–S94. 1 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Keryn A., Marie Therese Lowe, Miriam C. Keane, & D J Coster. (2010). THE OUTCOME OF CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION IN INFANTS, CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS. Transplantation. 90. 31–31. 3 indexed citations
4.
Brereton, Helen M., et al.. (2009). A steroid-inducible promoter for the cornea. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 93(9). 1255–1259. 8 indexed citations
5.
Williams, Keryn A., et al.. (2004). Topically applied antibody fragments penetrate into the back of the rabbit eye. Eye. 19(8). 910–913. 25 indexed citations
6.
Easty, D L, Antonio Secchi, Giorgio Ciprandi, et al.. (2001). Clinical evaluation of twice-daily emedastine 0.05% eye drops (emadine eye drops) versus levocabastine 0.05% eye drops in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 131(6). 691–698. 27 indexed citations
7.
Thiel, Michael, et al.. (2001). Low-dose, short-term treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody prolongs corneal allograft survival. Transplantation Proceedings. 33(1-2). 635–636. 7 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Justine R., Prue H. Hart, Christopher R. Parish, et al.. (1999). Experimental melanin-induced uveitis in the Fischer 344 rat is inhibited by anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, but not by mannose-6-phosphate. Clinical & Experimental Immunology. 115(1). 64–71. 17 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Keryn A., et al.. (1995). Graft survival after corneal transplantation: Role of factors with the potential for recipient presensitisation. 27(3). 1921–2136. 3 indexed citations
10.
Fraunfelder, F. T., D J Coster, Roger Drew, & Frederick W. Fraunfelder. (1990). Ocular Injury Induced by Methyl Ethyl Ketone Peroxide. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 110(6). 635–640. 4 indexed citations
11.
Coster, D J & Keryn A. Williams. (1989). Immunosuppression for corneal transplantation and treatment of graft rejection.. PubMed. 21(1 Pt 3). 3125–6. 10 indexed citations
12.
McClellan, Kathleen A. & D J Coster. (1987). UVEITIS: A STRATEGY FOR DIAGNOSIS. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology. 15(3). 227–241. 4 indexed citations
13.
Williams, Keryn A. & D J Coster. (1985). Penetrating corneal transplantation in the inbred rat: a new model.. PubMed. 26(1). 23–30. 117 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026