D. Höschen

857 total citations
11 papers, 40 citations indexed

About

D. Höschen is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Höschen has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 40 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Materials Chemistry and 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in D. Höschen's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (6 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2 papers). D. Höschen is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (6 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2 papers). D. Höschen collaborates with scholars based in Germany, China and Netherlands. D. Höschen's co-authors include Ch. Linsmeier, S. Möller, Yu Gao, Y. Liang, O. Grulke, Malte Henkel, K.P. Hollfeld, Christian Dellen, G. Satheeswaran and S.C. Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Review of Scientific Instruments and Materials.

In The Last Decade

D. Höschen

9 papers receiving 38 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. Höschen Germany 4 22 15 11 10 8 11 40
M. Gruca Poland 4 16 0.7× 9 0.6× 6 0.5× 9 0.9× 3 0.4× 10 37
E. Flom Germany 4 37 1.7× 12 0.8× 4 0.4× 10 1.0× 8 1.0× 8 39
V. Borsuk Germany 5 51 2.3× 18 1.2× 13 1.2× 15 1.5× 14 1.8× 6 59
H. Lan China 5 54 2.5× 28 1.9× 10 0.9× 17 1.7× 11 1.4× 18 81
A. de la Peña Spain 5 56 2.5× 15 1.0× 7 0.6× 14 1.4× 34 4.3× 17 71
M. Knaup Germany 6 45 2.0× 43 2.9× 4 0.4× 17 1.7× 7 0.9× 7 64
G. Offermanns Germany 5 55 2.5× 19 1.3× 19 1.7× 12 1.2× 14 1.8× 10 65
L. Rudischhauser Germany 5 49 2.2× 34 2.3× 8 0.7× 10 1.0× 22 2.8× 9 59
Jiajie Ling United States 4 40 1.8× 30 2.0× 11 1.0× 10 1.0× 2 0.3× 7 79
Scott Hertel United States 4 15 0.7× 6 0.4× 11 1.0× 3 0.3× 8 1.0× 6 36

Countries citing papers authored by D. Höschen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Höschen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Höschen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Höschen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Höschen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Höschen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Höschen. The network helps show where D. Höschen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Höschen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Höschen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Höschen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Höschen. D. Höschen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Möller, S., et al.. (2025). High-throughput MeV ion beam analysis − quantitative full stoichiometry imaging of a granite. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 560. 165626–165626. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mayer, M., M. Balden, T. Bräuer, et al.. (2024). Properties of boron layers deposited during boronisations in W7-X. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 41. 101778–101778. 1 indexed citations
3.
Möller, S., et al.. (2024). An MeV Proton Irradiation Facility: DICE. Materials. 17(15). 3646–3646.
4.
Hubeny, M., D. Höschen, O. Neubauer, et al.. (2021). Progress on MATEO probe heads and observation system. Fusion Engineering and Design. 167. 112297–112297. 1 indexed citations
5.
Drews, P., T. Dittmar, C. Killer, et al.. (2021). Effectiveness of local methane and hydrogen injection into the scrape-off layer of W7-X by means of the multi-purpose manipulator. Fusion Engineering and Design. 173. 112786–112786. 1 indexed citations
6.
Möller, S., et al.. (2021). A New High-Throughput Focused MeV Ion-Beam Analysis Setup. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 10–10. 10 indexed citations
7.
Höschen, D., M. Hubeny, G. Czymek, et al.. (2020). Design aspects of MATEO manipulator at Wendelstein 7-X. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).
8.
Cai, Jianqing, Y. Liang, C. Killer, et al.. (2019). A new multi-channel Mach probe measuring the radial ion flow velocity profile in the boundary plasma of the W7-X stellarator. Review of Scientific Instruments. 90(3). 33502–33502. 3 indexed citations
9.
Hubeny, M., D. Höschen, M. Rack, et al.. (2018). Diagnostic setup for the divertor manipulator at wendelstein 7-X. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 18. 77–81. 4 indexed citations
10.
Henkel, Malte, D. Höschen, Y. Liang, et al.. (2018). Multi-channel retarding field analyzer for EAST. Plasma Science and Technology. 20(5). 54001–54001. 5 indexed citations
11.
Drews, P., Y. Liang, S.C. Liu, et al.. (2017). Measurement of the plasma edge profiles using the combined probe on W7-X. Nuclear Fusion. 57(12). 126020–126020. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026