D. H. Scarisbrick
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Food Science
- Co-authors
- Jonathan WilkesJ. D. IvinsKA EvansHerman BuschkeGail KuslanskyMartin J. SliwinskiO. O. OlufajoM. K. V. Carr
- Topics
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers)Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica (7 papers)Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalCanada
In The Last Decade
D. H. Scarisbrick
37 papers receiving 622 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Plant Science 516
- Molecular Biology 243
- Agronomy and Crop Science 151
- Soil Science 116
- Food Science 40
Countries citing papers authored by D. H. Scarisbrick
This map shows the geographic impact of D. H. Scarisbrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. H. Scarisbrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. H. Scarisbrick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. H. Scarisbrick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. H. Scarisbrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. H. Scarisbrick. The network helps show where D. H. Scarisbrick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. H. Scarisbrick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. H. Scarisbrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. H. Scarisbrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. H. Scarisbrick. D. H. Scarisbrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Practical Statistics and Experimental Design for Plant and Crop Science | 248 |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | Germination of Chamaecytisus palmensis as affected by ageing and method of pre-germination treatment. | 2 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Oilseed rape physiology | 22 |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | The effect of sowing date and sampling technique on the seed yield of linseed (Linum usitatissimum). | 2 |
| 18 | Effect of nitrogen on the development of spring oilseed rape. | 10 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About D. H. Scarisbrick
D. H. Scarisbrick is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers), Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica (7 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (151 citations), Plant Science (516 citations) and Soil Science (116 citations). D. H. Scarisbrick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Wilkes, J. D. Ivins, KA Evans, Herman Buschke, Gail Kuslansky, Martin J. Sliwinski, O. O. Olufajo, M. K. V. Carr, Chris D. Collins and David A. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Applied Ecology and Annals of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.