D. G. Middleton

3.0k total citations
8 papers, 78 citations indexed

About

D. G. Middleton is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, D. G. Middleton has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 78 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 paper in Surgery. Recurrent topics in D. G. Middleton's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (2 papers). D. G. Middleton is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (2 papers). D. G. Middleton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. D. G. Middleton's co-authors include Ruth Hamilton, Iain Livingstone, C. M. Tarbert, Mario Giardini, Andrew Bastawrous, J. Brudvik, S. S. Henshaw, J. R. M. Annand, Harald W. Grießhammer and S. Stave and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, PLoS ONE and The European Physical Journal A.

In The Last Decade

D. G. Middleton

7 papers receiving 74 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
D. G. Middleton United Kingdom	6	34	19	19	13	12	8	78
Richard Berg United States	5	3 0.1×	8 0.4×	18 0.9×	18 1.4×	12 1.0×	9	71
D. Wright United States	3	63 1.9×	2 0.1×	6 0.3×	5 0.4×	3 0.3×	6	95
K. Ukai Japan	6	480 14.1×	2 0.1×	5 0.3×	6 0.5×	11 0.9×	6	499
M. Musgrave United States	4	5 0.1×	8 0.4×		15 1.2×		8	49
Marco Lawrenz Germany	9	98 2.9×	9 0.5×	394 20.7×	1 0.1×	21 1.8×	9	398
M. Filliger France	3	24 0.7×		10 0.5×	8 0.6×		4	45
K. Yu. Todyshev Russia	6	45 1.3×		7 0.4×	9 0.7×		17	58
Jake Miller United States	6	25 0.7×	3 0.2×	1 0.1×	12 0.9×		17	109
D. Orme Japan	5	31 0.9×		8 0.4×	7 0.5×		10	54
P. Přidal Czechia	4	30 0.9×		7 0.4×	6 0.5×		9	47

Countries citing papers authored by D. G. Middleton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. G. Middleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. G. Middleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. G. Middleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. G. Middleton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. G. Middleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. G. Middleton. The network helps show where D. G. Middleton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. G. Middleton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. G. Middleton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. G. Middleton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. G. Middleton. D. G. Middleton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Middleton, D. G., et al.. (2022). Novel electrode design reduces sensory threshold current drift during peripheral nerve evaluation in patients considered for sacral nerve stimulation. Journal of Clinical Urology. 17(3). 234–237. 1 indexed citations

2.

Hasemann, Wolfgang, Catriona Keerie, Valentina Assi, et al.. (2021). Comparing performance on the Months of the Year Backwards test in hospitalised patients with delirium, dementia, and no cognitive impairment: an exploratory study. European Geriatric Medicine. 12(6). 1257–1265. 10 indexed citations

3.

Middleton, D. G., et al.. (2020). Community acceptance for indirect potable reuse. 5(1). 1–10. 1 indexed citations

4.

Livingstone, Iain, et al.. (2019). Testing Pediatric Acuity With an iPad: Validation of “Peekaboo Vision” in Malawi and the UK. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 8(1). 8–8. 11 indexed citations

5.

Livingstone, Iain, C. M. Tarbert, Mario Giardini, et al.. (2016). Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices. PLoS ONE. 11(3). e0150676–e0150676. 18 indexed citations

6.

Annand, J. R. M., J. Brudvik, G. Feldman, et al.. (2015). Compton scattering from the deuteron below pion-production threshold. Physical Review C. 92(2). 5 indexed citations

7.

Annand, J. R. M., J. Brudvik, G. Feldman, et al.. (2014). Measurement of Compton Scattering from the Deuteron and an Improved Extraction of the Neutron Electromagnetic Polarizabilities. Physical Review Letters. 113(26). 262506–262506. 24 indexed citations

8.

Middleton, D. G., J. R. M. Annand, C. Barbieri, et al.. (2009). Knockout of proton-neutron pairs from 16O with electromagnetic probes. The European Physical Journal A. 43(2). 137–143. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact