D. D. Leach

464 total citations
18 papers, 387 citations indexed

About

D. D. Leach is a scholar working on Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, D. D. Leach has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 387 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Radiation, 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in D. D. Leach's work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (6 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers). D. D. Leach is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (6 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers). D. D. Leach collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Uzbekistan. D. D. Leach's co-authors include R. Vandenbosch, Anne E. Ray, C. -C. Sahm, T. Murakami, Martin J. Murphy, Pieter Meiert Grootes, George Farwell, Fred Schmidt, M. Stuiver and S. Gil and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

In The Last Decade

D. D. Leach

18 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. D. Leach United States 12 275 132 125 54 54 18 387
E. Finckh Germany 14 338 1.2× 154 1.2× 196 1.6× 34 0.6× 30 0.6× 36 498
M.M. Coimbra Brazil 12 241 0.9× 141 1.1× 108 0.9× 15 0.3× 21 0.4× 29 350
K.H. Chang United States 8 158 0.6× 89 0.7× 122 1.0× 58 1.1× 10 0.2× 15 365
C M Henderson New Zealand 12 334 1.2× 124 0.9× 127 1.0× 33 0.6× 90 1.7× 17 699
C. Bordeanu United States 10 270 1.0× 82 0.6× 84 0.7× 19 0.4× 21 0.4× 30 365
L. Fimiani Germany 12 244 0.9× 95 0.7× 116 0.9× 41 0.8× 31 0.6× 27 442
W.G. Winn United States 11 329 1.2× 163 1.2× 220 1.8× 23 0.4× 38 0.7× 20 447
E. Chávez Mexico 11 456 1.7× 206 1.6× 240 1.9× 13 0.2× 95 1.8× 59 566
George L. Bate United States 10 180 0.7× 33 0.3× 118 0.9× 19 0.4× 45 0.8× 15 339
Shuichi Gunji Japan 12 443 1.6× 81 0.6× 338 2.7× 47 0.9× 15 0.3× 95 670

Countries citing papers authored by D. D. Leach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. D. Leach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. D. Leach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. D. Leach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. D. Leach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. D. Leach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. D. Leach. The network helps show where D. D. Leach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. D. Leach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. D. Leach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. D. Leach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. D. Leach. D. D. Leach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Gil, S., et al.. (1991). Spin distribution of the compound nucleus formed byO16+154Sm. Physical Review C. 43(2). 701–708. 23 indexed citations
2.
Grootes, Pieter Meiert, George Farwell, Fred Schmidt, D. D. Leach, & M. Stuiver. (1989). Rapid response of tree cellulose radiocarbon content to changes in atmospheric14CO2concentration. Tellus B. 41B(2). 134–148. 15 indexed citations
3.
Grootes, Pieter Meiert, George Farwell, Fred Schmidt, D. D. Leach, & M. Stuiver. (1989). Rapid response of tree cellulose radiocarbon content to changes in atmospheric <sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Tellus B. 41(2). 134–134. 24 indexed citations
4.
Grootes, Pieter Meiert, George Farwell, Fred Schmidt, D. D. Leach, & Minze Stuiver. (1989). Importance of Biospheric Co2 in a Subcanopy Atmosphere Deduced From 14C AMS Measurements. Radiocarbon. 31(3). 475–480. 11 indexed citations
5.
Connolly, R. & D. D. Leach. (1988). A temperature- and humidity-stabilized beam bunch phase detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 273(1). 40–42. 3 indexed citations
6.
Schmidt, Fred, et al.. (1987). Early expectations of AMS: Greater ages and tiny fractions. One failure? — One success. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 29(1-2). 97–99. 9 indexed citations
7.
Vandenbosch, R., T. Murakami, C. -C. Sahm, et al.. (1986). Anomalously Broad Spin Distributions in Sub-barrier Fusion Reactions. Physical Review Letters. 56(12). 1234–1236. 75 indexed citations
8.
Grootes, Pieter Meiert, et al.. (1986). Radiocarbon Dating with the University of Washington Accelerator Mass Spectrometry System. Radiocarbon. 28(2A). 237–245. 7 indexed citations
9.
Sahm, C. -C., T. Murakami, J. G. Cramer, et al.. (1986). Total reaction cross section forC12onC12,Ca40,Zr90, andPb208between 10 and 35 MeV/nucleon. Physical Review C. 34(6). 2165–2170. 48 indexed citations
10.
Ray, Anne E., D. D. Leach, R. Vandenbosch, K. T. Lesko, & D. Shapira. (1986). Nonequilibrium Population of Magnetic Substates and Excitation-Energy Division in the Decay of an Orbiting Complex. Physical Review Letters. 57(7). 815–818. 19 indexed citations
11.
Murakami, T., C. -C. Sahm, R. Vandenbosch, et al.. (1986). Fission probes of sub-barrier fusion cross section enhancements and spin distribution broadening. Physical Review C. 34(4). 1353–1365. 63 indexed citations
12.
Vandenbosch, R., T. Murakami, C. -C. Sahm, et al.. (1986). Vandenboschet al.Respond:. Physical Review Letters. 57(12). 1499–1499. 8 indexed citations
13.
Ray, Anne E., et al.. (1985). Entrance channel dependence of back-angle yields: Orbiting inMg24+O16reaction. Physical Review C. 31(4). 1573–1575. 28 indexed citations
14.
Dyer, P., et al.. (1985). Cross sections relevant to gamma-ray astronomy: Alpha-particle-induced reactions onC12,N14, andO16nuclei. Physical Review C. 32(6). 1873–1881. 16 indexed citations
15.
Norman, E. B., et al.. (1984). Cross sections relevant to gamma-ray astronomy: Alpha-particle-induced reactions. Physical Review C. 29(2). 394–402. 14 indexed citations
16.
Farwell, George, et al.. (1984). The accelerator mass spectrometry facility at the University of Washington: Current status and an application to the 14C profile of a tree ring. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 5(2). 144–149. 12 indexed citations
17.
Farwell, George, et al.. (1983). Technological Advances in the University of Washington Accelerator Mass Spectrometry System. Radiocarbon. 25(2). 755–760. 2 indexed citations
18.
Farwell, George, et al.. (1983). Current 14C Measurements with the University of Washington FN Tandem Accelerator. Radiocarbon. 25(2). 711–718. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Finckh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M.M. Coimbra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K.H. Chang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C M Henderson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Bordeanu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Fimiani Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W.G. Winn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Chávez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by George L. Bate Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shuichi Gunji
Rankless by CCL
2026