D. C. Malcolm

2.1k total citations
59 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

D. C. Malcolm is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, D. C. Malcolm has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 19 papers in Ecology and 16 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in D. C. Malcolm's work include Forest ecology and management (24 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (14 papers) and Seedling growth and survival studies (13 papers). D. C. Malcolm is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (24 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (14 papers) and Seedling growth and survival studies (13 papers). D. C. Malcolm collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. D. C. Malcolm's co-authors include E. W. Carson, Philip A. Robertson, John R. Packham, M. G. R. Cannell, Ian K. Bradbury, R. Worrell, W. L. Mason, J. C. Carlyle, B. D. Titus and S. P. Cuttle and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

D. C. Malcolm

56 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. C. Malcolm United Kingdom 20 734 509 508 329 328 59 1.5k
G. F. Weetman Canada 26 943 1.3× 281 0.6× 644 1.3× 418 1.3× 289 0.9× 67 1.4k
N. Lust Belgium 25 865 1.2× 527 1.0× 477 0.9× 398 1.2× 556 1.7× 99 1.9k
Hans Persson Sweden 22 861 1.2× 690 1.4× 467 0.9× 960 2.9× 398 1.2× 27 1.8k
H. N. Pandey India 26 829 1.1× 581 1.1× 375 0.7× 597 1.8× 366 1.1× 62 1.7k
P. J. Kalisz United States 16 491 0.7× 304 0.6× 406 0.8× 335 1.0× 353 1.1× 32 1.2k
Erika F. Latty United States 9 562 0.8× 355 0.7× 543 1.1× 426 1.3× 530 1.6× 11 1.5k
K. E. Rehfuess Germany 21 501 0.7× 592 1.2× 398 0.8× 308 0.9× 272 0.8× 75 1.4k
Claude Camiré Canada 24 867 1.2× 415 0.8× 660 1.3× 722 2.2× 464 1.4× 65 2.0k
Håkan Staaf Sweden 15 554 0.8× 294 0.6× 413 0.8× 679 2.1× 499 1.5× 15 1.4k
James O. Klemmedson United States 22 837 1.1× 386 0.8× 610 1.2× 508 1.5× 723 2.2× 60 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by D. C. Malcolm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. C. Malcolm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. C. Malcolm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. C. Malcolm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. C. Malcolm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. C. Malcolm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. C. Malcolm. The network helps show where D. C. Malcolm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. C. Malcolm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. C. Malcolm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. C. Malcolm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. C. Malcolm. D. C. Malcolm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Worrell, R., et al.. (2010). Broadleaved tree breeding in Scotland: recent progress and future priorities.. 64(3). 6–11. 1 indexed citations
2.
Malcolm, D. C., et al.. (2007). Wind-driven gap development in Birkley Wood, a long-term retention of planted Sitka spruce in upland Britain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 37(10). 1787–1796. 11 indexed citations
3.
Woolliams, John, et al.. (2002). A study of population variation and inheritance in Sitka spruce II. Age trends in genetic parameters for vigour traits and optimum selection ages. Silvae genetica. 51. 55–65. 8 indexed citations
4.
Malcolm, D. C., et al.. (1999). Pinus caribaea in China: introduction, genetic resources and future prospects. Forest Ecology and Management. 117(1-3). 1–15. 16 indexed citations
5.
Ennos, Richard A., R. Worrell, & D. C. Malcolm. (1998). The genetic management of native species in Scotland. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 71(1). 1–23. 46 indexed citations
6.
Ennos, Richard A., et al.. (1998). Notice to Contributors. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 71(1). 1–1. 6 indexed citations
7.
Malcolm, D. C.. (1997). Peatland forestry — Ecology and principles. Forest Ecology and Management. 98(1). 102–103. 1 indexed citations
8.
Titus, B. D. & D. C. Malcolm. (1992). Nutrient Leaching from the Litter Layer after Clearfelling of Sitka Spruce Stands on Peaty Gley Soils. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 65(4). 389–416. 17 indexed citations
9.
Worrell, R. & D. C. Malcolm. (1990). Productivity of Sitka Spruce in Northern Britain 2. Prediction from Site Factors. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 63(2). 119–128. 30 indexed citations
10.
McKay, H.M. & D. C. Malcolm. (1988). A comparison of the fine root component of a pure and a mixed coniferous stand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 18(11). 1416–1426. 32 indexed citations
11.
Carlyle, J. C. & D. C. Malcolm. (1986). Biomass and element capital of a 7-year-old lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta dougl.) stand growing on deep peat. Forest Ecology and Management. 14(4). 285–291. 1 indexed citations
12.
Carlyle, J. C. & D. C. Malcolm. (1986). The use of ion exchange resin bags to assess N availability beneath pure spruce and larch + spruce stands growing on a deep peat soil. Plant and Soil. 93(1). 123–127. 7 indexed citations
13.
Malcolm, D. C., J. E. Hooker, & C. T. Wheeler. (1985). Frankiasymbiosis as a source of nitrogen in forestry: a case study of symbiotic nitrogen-fixation in a mixed Alnus-Picea plantation in Scotland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B Biological Sciences. 85(3-4). 263–282. 15 indexed citations
14.
Malcolm, D. C., et al.. (1982). Broadleaves in Britain : future management and research : proceedings of a symposium held at the University of Technology, Loughborough, 7-9 July, 1982, sponsored by the Forestry Commission and the Institute of Chartered Foresters. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 9 indexed citations
15.
Hayes, A.J. & D. C. Malcolm. (1980). Diseases and pests.. 82–99. 1 indexed citations
16.
Malcolm, D. C.. (1979). Some effects of the first rotation on site properties.. Irish forestry. 2 indexed citations
17.
Bradbury, Ian K. & D. C. Malcolm. (1978). Dry matter accumulation by Piceasitchensis seedlings during winter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 8(2). 207–213. 12 indexed citations
18.
Malcolm, D. C., et al.. (1977). The sulphur: Nitrogen ratio of conifer foliage in relation to atmospheric pollution with sulphur dioxide. Plant and Soil. 47(1). 89–102. 28 indexed citations
19.
Malcolm, D. C. & E. W. Carson. (1975). The Plant Root and Its Environment.. Journal of Ecology. 63(2). 715–715. 242 indexed citations
20.
Malcolm, D. C., et al.. (1972). Soil Physical Factors Affecting Root Morphology and Stability of Scots Pine on Upland Heaths. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 45(1). 23–36. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026